Page 3 of 3
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:17 pm
by Webby1971
Great signing, I can't believe the negative comments,we keep harping on about all the sub standard foreign imports (rightly so) and then when we go out and buy not only a British player but a WIGANER who has been the best British centre for a few years now and looks very handy at stand off, he was superb for Eng v. France there last season, people are still not happy??? Well done Mr Lenegan great signing.
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:24 pm
by cumbria_warrior
hopefull?
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:35 pm
by tonyjoe
GOOD !!!
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 7:51 pm
by primrose-n-blue
fandabidosy!!!
He cries off twice a year with flu((cos his number came out for drug testing before a game) when the rest off us perhaps gets it once in five years))
A great move.
And for Mathers, his game is his attack. Betcha he goes and scores against Wigan if fit!
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:21 pm
by exile in Tiger country
Excellent, a BRILLIANT centre for free, £125,000 to get rid of Mathers. Well worth it!
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:25 pm
by mickh
What a good day! We sign Gleeson who is a good Wigan lad.
We get rid of Mathers, which has got the person who extended his contract, off the hook! I'm not bothered if he scores against Wigan, Gleeson will just walk through him to score more.
Oh! yes, just one word, Good
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:37 am
by wigan/pier
Good but would have preferred a prop.
Re: Gleeson in one word: Good or bad signing?
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:40 am
by ashtonned
One thing that I hope the signing of Gleeson means is that this will be the end of Bailey at the club once his contract ends at the end of the season.