highland convert wrote:Ok new standoff and new prop comes in for next season. WHO GETS TH BULLET?
We shout for a consistant team. We cry when the youth dont get a chance. We call for stability yet we crave new signings,
You must have forgotten the reason there is speculation we will sign a half back is because it was IL who said he was after a prop and a half back and that was after re-signing TL (when he also said he thought TL would end up as a 9).
So you need to take IL to task if you think we ought to stick with the players we have.
I am certainly not craving a new signing here as given we offered TL a new deal we should IMO stick with him at 7 rather then sign Brough and risk losing MM which is what I think the result would be. It is the lesser of two evils because really TL is not a world class 7 but what is done is done - we have given him a new deal.
So lets not make things worse by signing an average number 7 that may cost us the services of an up and coming player like MM.
Sorry but you are shouting for a new feast when you have a banquet in fnt of you. We play the younsters next seas and come nineth. is that acceptable. Or we come first but the reserves don't get a game.
The mind boggles
Well my mind is boggling at what point you are trying to make here as it seems contradictory to what you wrote above.
Are you saying it would be a good thing to sigh Brough and move TL to 9? If MM was lost in the process would that be a good thing? MM is hardly a reserve player but a regular member of the 1st 17 and a very effective one.
Dave
So