Page 3 of 7
Re: Sam Tomkins
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 5:27 pm
by Wes
Raynor has been cited, Refer to tribunal. Law: 15.1(b) Detail: When tackling or attempting to tackle makes contact with the head or neck of an opponent Grade: B
Whats the min max of a grade b offence anybody?
Re: Sam Tomkins
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 5:43 pm
by billyboy
More than one person (including Potter) claims that Raynor was trying to "dislodge the ball". Considering where The ball was in relation to Sam's head, maybe Raynor should go to Specsavers.
How Ganson could not give a penalty for that, but penalise a Wigan player for having a hand on a Bradfors players shoulder defies belief.
I agree with the comment that the incident swung the game to Bradford.
As for the comments on Redvee, are you really concerned with the opinions of demented Scousers? I'm not!
Re: Sam Tomkins
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 5:44 pm
by StarAndy
in short a one match ban and £50 fine
Re: Sam Tomkins
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 5:58 pm
by Kittwazzer
billyboy wrote:More than one person (including Potter) claims that Raynor was trying to "dislodge the ball". Considering where The ball was in relation to Sam's head, maybe Raynor should go to Specsavers.
How Ganson could not give a penalty for that, but penalise a Wigan player for having a hand on a Bradfors players shoulder defies belief.
I agree with the comment that the incident swung the game to Bradford.
As for the comments on Redvee, are you really concerned with the opinions of demented Scousers? I'm not!
Actually, I think he did! Just watched it again. After all the confusion, getting clarification from Silverwood, giving the red card, Ganson raises his arms towards the posts which he wouldn't do for a conversion. I think he gave the penalty not realising the conversion hadn't been taken!
Re: Sam Tomkins
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 6:37 pm
by shaunedwardsfanclub
billyboy wrote:More than one person (including Potter) claims that Raynor was trying to "dislodge the ball". considering where The ball was in relation to Sam's head, maybe Raynor should go to Specsavers.
How Ganson could not give a penalty for that, but penalise a Wigan player for having a hand on a Bradfors players shoulder defies belief.
I agree with the comment that the incident swung the game to Bradford.
As for the comments on Redvee, are you really concerned with the opinions of demented Scousers? I'm not!
Trying to dislodge the ball! Waht a joke, the only thing that Raynor was trying to dislodge was a few teeth. If the shoe had been on the other foot everyone outside Wigan would have been asking for a public hanging. Why did Kear not suggest a 10 game ban?[/b]
Re: Sam Tomkins
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 7:34 pm
by cpwigan
Potter is trying to blame tackling techniques for his teams injuries. Idiot.
I have always said it and I always shall. Once a coach has been 3 years out of the NRL, whatever nationality they are no better than any other SL coach. Potter has been here what 6 years?
Re: Sam Tomkins
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 8:31 pm
by cpwigan
Re: Sam Tomkins
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 8:33 pm
by cpwigan
Any RL professional who has the gaul to sugest Raynor was going for the ball shoulkd be similarly suspended
Re: Sam Tomkins
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 8:46 pm
by cumbria_warrior
I find it disgusting that a lot of comments on the various sites from other teams fans are saying that they enjoyed what happened, there not fans of the sport. I hope Sam comes back next week and runs riot, a cheap shot when there was no chance of catching Sam or the ball, should be at least 2 - 3 game ban, just hope he counts his lucky stars that he went off because Joel was gonna sort him by the look of him
Re: Sam Tomkins
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 9:41 pm
by gpartin
I put a post on Twitter yesterday saying the RL press are absolute cheating scum. That brought some total muppets out of the woodwork I tell thee.
