Page 3 of 9
Re: Farrell leaving good f...
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 9:06 am
by Welski
thegimble posted:
[
The only problem i can see is that he will not come back and coach the side this is more worrying in the long run. .
[/quote]
I don't see why he wouldnt want to come back?
Two years down the line; he has won the RU WC single handely; picked up some tips on how the speak with a proper accent; then returns to take Wigan back to the top where we belong!
Re: Farrell leaving good f...
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 9:53 am
by mrs_carney
Thats a thing how will faz cope without his "erms" when hes talking
Re: Farrell leaving good f...
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:06 am
by Welski
mrs_carney posted:
Thats a thing how will faz cope without his "erms" when hes talking
Class!
Re: Farrell leaving good f...
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:15 am
by DaveO
DaiJones posted:
Most incredibly of all however, Diamond says he would play the Faz at fly half or inside centre. Now this is a real indictment of Unions's inferiority, Dave O, Ian, etc. if a 6ft 4, 17st plus prop forward (for that he was for much of 2004) can be considered to have the skills, pace, imagination and kicking game to boss a game in the pivotal positions in a Union back line then the thirteen a side game really is light years ahead.
I read this and was equally surprised but there are two things about this from my side of the debate.
First of all the idea of playing him as a fly half or inside centre shows RU as inferior - so what? Will anyone in the pro-union media maintain that view? Does anyone care outside the game? It doesn't really matter where he plays to the wider public, just that he moved codes.
The other thing that was said about where he would play by the Saracens coach was that he was at 30 (he is 29 anyway) too old to learn how to be a Union forward. That is why they would play him at fly-half or inside centre. I thought this was typical of an RU man perpetuating the myth that Union is a far more technical game. It's different but it is not quantum physics. Should he go to Union Farrell is a dedicted pro and would learn the ropes quickly enough.
It is a comment such as that which to me demonstrates how superior some Union people think of themselves and their sport. The fact that they consider an athlete of Farrell's ability incapable of mastering their game is ridiculous.
I also have a sneaky suspicion that should Farrell turn down the move the press will be dominated with statements like "there was no position for him" or "at 29 he was too old" etc. Comments like that from Saracens just show they will spin it to the detriment of RL and it will be a PR disaster whatever happens.
Dave
Re: Farrell leaving good f...
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:24 am
by Welski
DaiJones posted:
Most incredibly of all however, Diamond says he would play the Faz at fly half or inside centre. Now this is a real indictment of Unions's inferiority, Dave O, Ian, etc. if a 6ft 4, 17st plus prop forward (for that he was for much of 2004) can be considered to have the skills, pace, imagination and kicking game to boss a game in the pivotal positions in a Union back line then the thirteen a side game really is light years ahead.
I just think they are different games mate and evolving differently. Union found success with giant wingers when the likes of Tuigamala and latterly Joanna Lomu appeared. Maybe they see in Faz a player that can bring that power whilst retaining the skills to the number 10 shirt.
Lets face it you could stick virtually any decent seven mobile
players from any Superleague Club behind a competant Union Pack and the team would be awesome.
Re: Farrell leaving good f...
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:33 am
by DaveO
thegimble posted:
The top Welsh players from the 70's onwards were tachnical proffesionals. During the 70's all bar one (I believe JPR) wore adidas boots conicidence i feel not as we know now they were been illegally paid. There cushy jobs were as PA or Public Relations work for a couple of hours a week and were paid well and then off training for the rest.
So why did they come north then? They were giving up national adulation and leaving themselves open to a real slating. Scott Gibbs was banned from the clubhouse of his old club when he went to Saints!
I don't see the logic in moving away from 5 nations regognition (as it was then) to play RL which had less media expsore then than it does now if they were paid players.
I think you will find that they didn't just work 2 hours a week in their cushy jobs and that not all of them were in that position anyway.
We can not go and call Faz a Judas when lets be honest we all supported Offiah, Tuigamala and Quinell when they came. I bet supports of them in Union called them Judas when they moved.
As I have said calling players Judas is out of order but it wasn't fans who may have had a go at Union players moving to league but the Union establishment!
They became persona-non-grata overnight.
League players yes were paid better than Union in them days so are we not been hypocritical to say that Faz is a Judas for doing the same. We gave the above mentioned supporrt but some turn on him.
If he was leaving at the end of 2006 fine. I have no problem with players taking advantage of the free market when their commitments to their clubs are fullfilled. In Farrel's case as I have said in other posts his position in the game is also something to consider. He is not an Offiah who was playing for Rosslyn-Park and spotted by an RL scout but the current GB captain and that makes his move more than a club issue.
One thing we are guranteed they will bring in a World Class player to replace him whether it is Williams, Sculthorpe or Morley.
Why do you think this? There is no way it automatically follws that if Farrell leaves we will be able to replace him with a player of equal ability.
Dave Whelan promised us three top Australians a while back. They never materialised. Look at what happened to Gasnier. He didn't come either becuase his club held him to his contract (there is a novel idea!). It is much harder to sign top players these days and Wigan can't just walk into a club waving a cheque book and get who they want.
Dave
Re: Farrell leaving good f...
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:34 am
by proud_pie_eater
I know everyone has their own opinions on Farrell (possibly) leaving Wigan but in the end what we think doesnt matter. Farrell has to make his own desicion and I as a Wigan fan will respect whatever he desides. He has done a great service to rugby league and all we can do know is wait for his desicion. He will either choose to stay with Wigan and finish his career with loyal fans and players in league OR he will choose to go, learn to play a different sport and gain money and glory in union. His choice!
Re: Farrell leaving good f...
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:50 am
by DaveO
Welski posted:
DaveO posted:
Dai,
The analogy of League taking Welsh players doesn't hold water. They were amateurs and simply could not earn a living as a professional sportsman in RU despite the odd brown paper bag and cushy job.
They were not contracted to anyone.
I've heard others say this analogy isnt relevant but I think its at the heart of this debate. I don't really think the fans really care too much whether a player is contracted or not or what the relative pay scales are. I think the most important thing for supporters of the 'rival' codes is that they want to see those they consider the best players playing in their code/team. They see it as an affront that the 'enemy' has pinched one of theirs.
For me the contractual situation is important. There are two different discussions here though. The first is how it relates to League taking Union players in the past and the second is the situation with Farrell who has two years of his to run now.
With Farrell if he can get out of it what is to say the same des not apply to any of our other players? If RU can prise away the curret GB captain , golden boot winner and current man of steel from a two year commmitment why can't they equally just waltz in and take O'Loughlin for example?
Holding Faz to his contract is not only what the club should do because having him here for the next two years is a good thing but because it does not set a precident that any of our players are available if the price is right.
If any player is tempted by RU at the end of his current contract it is up to RL to make it attractive for him to stay in the game. If they can't then there it is no use crying about it and they will leave but IMO this situation is nothing like that.
As you point out they couldn't earn a living in RU (although you ask any All Black from those days) and this was the motivating factor in switching to RL. I think that's a less noble reason for switching than the reasons players give now. If we accept that someone like Faz isnt going to earn a whole lot more in swithcing then one would have to think the resons are as assumed (ASSUMING HE ACTUALLY GOES!). Namely that he relishes a new challenge and a new and arguably wider stage on which to display his skills.
I don't have a problem if he does this at the end of 2006.
Dave
Re: Farrell leaving good f...
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:00 am
by Welski
DaveO posted:
DaiJones posted:
The other thing that was said about where he would play by the Saracens coach was that he was at 30 (he is 29 anyway) too old to learn how to be a Union forward. That is why they would play him at fly-half or inside centre. I thought this was typical of an RU man perpetuating the myth that Union is a far more technical game. It's different but it is not quantum physics. Should he go to Union Farrell is a dedicted pro and would learn the ropes quickly enough.
It is a comment such as that which to me demonstrates how superior some Union people think of themselves and their sport. The fact that they consider an athlete of Farrell's ability incapable of mastering their game is ridiculous.
I also have a sneaky suspicion that should Farrell turn down the move the press will be dominated with statements like "there was no position for him" or "at 29 he was too old" etc. Comments like that from Saracens just show they will spin it to the detriment of RL and it will be a PR disaster whatever happens.
Dave
I can see why you make these points Dave there certainly is a bias in the national press towards Union and it is (very) frustrating. However having been around union all my life (though never a forward!) I have never encounted that from any players or coaches. In fact quite the opposite. I dont know him but I wouldnt have thought the Sarries coach would have meant anything derogatory to RL in suggesting it was too late for Faz to adapt. There is a young forward called James Forrester on the fringe of the England squad, he is big,tall, very quick with amazing hands (would be a superb League player) he reminds me in a strange way of SBW...and given the state of England RU at the moment I'm amazed he isnt given a shot...the reason given is that despite playing in Union all his life he is not considered good enough at the grubby side of back row forward play. They must be doing something very mystical at the bottom of those pile ups that takes years to learn!
Re: Farrell leaving good f...
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:25 am
by DaveO
Welski posted:
I can see why you make these points Dave there certainly is a bias in the national press towards Union and it is (very) frustrating. However having been around union all my life (though never a forward!) I have never encounted that from any players or coaches.
I am involved with Chester RUFC under-11's and there is none there either but they are not the press or the RU establishment and I am sure there are some die-hard old school RU types around who hate RL with a passion.
In fact quite the opposite. I dont know him but I wouldnt have thought the Sarries coach would have meant anything derogatory to RL in suggesting it was too late for Faz to adapt. There is a young forward called James Forrester on the fringe of the England squad, he is big,tall, very quick with amazing hands (would be a superb League player) he reminds me in a strange way of SBW...and given the state of England RU at the moment I'm amazed he isnt given a shot...the reason given is that despite playing in Union all his life he is not considered good enough at the grubby side of back row forward play. They must be doing something very mystical at the bottom of those pile ups that takes years to learn!
I honestly don't know what the fuss is about with rucks and mauls. They aren't that "technical" at all.
As to odd goings on in the pile up I am sure you have more experience than I
Dave