Re: Hock
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:25 am
Morph - No. but I am.
Claire Hannah has just tweeted: Just spoke to Wigan Warriors - they say NO announcement's due on Gareth Hock, despite all rumours on here!
#rugbyleague #wiganwarriors
WiganWarriorsFans.com
A site for fans of Wigan Warriors RLFC. News, views, statistics, profiles and more all contributed by supporters of Wigan RL.
https://www.wiganwarriorsfans.com/
Hock
Page 3 of 4
Re: Hock
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 11:41 am
Re: Hock
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:25 pm
Hocky was injured, a dead leg. He even had a fitness test on Friday which he failed and then attended the game. So at this stage, the rumours are just bull****.
Re: Hock
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:45 pm
Tweet from Sam! Heard some great rumours about Gaz today ! Haha. But I can confirm they are all rubbish !
Re: Hock
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:06 pm
Sadly I think Hock will get this nonsense every time he does not play. Partly due to his past and how much opposing fans fear him.
Re: Hock
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:25 pm
Very true - remember the delight of that tw@t "primose and blue" when the whole drug issue came up? In the end Mike banned him because he couldn't help himself from trying to rub it incpwigan wrote:Sadly I think Hock will get this nonsense every time he does not play. Partly due to his past and how much opposing fans fear him.
Re: Hock
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:35 pm
cpwigan wrote:Hocky was injured, a dead leg. He even had a fitness test on Friday which he failed and then attended the game. So at this stage, the rumours are just bull****.
And that is my view as well FWIW. The internet is a great thing until keyboard heroes decide to have what they look on as a laugh
Re: Hock
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:04 pm
I think you did! 
Re: Hock
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:11 pm
and you did this why?cherry.pie wrote:To be fair I think I achieved my aim of preventing most of the devious or occasionally downright nasty rumours from appearing on twitter searches and replacing them with the downright ridiculous.
Re: Hock
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:27 pm
Very commendable of youcherry.pie wrote:To mock those who had been spreading certain rumours about him on twitter at the time.medlocke wrote:and you did this why?cherry.pie wrote:To be fair I think I achieved my aim of preventing most of the devious or occasionally downright nasty rumours from appearing on twitter searches and replacing them with the downright ridiculous.