Page 3 of 3

Re: london broncos

Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 9:02 pm
by The Black Pearl
If it was any team but the Aussie's they would have been out of business.

Re: london broncos

Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:15 pm
by thegimble
The Black Pearl posted:
If it was any team but the Aussie's they would have been out of business.
Spot on.

Re: london broncos

Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:56 pm
by DaveO
The Black Pearl posted:
If it was any team but the Aussie's they would have been out of business.
Not true.

Gateshead were sacrificed to save Hull and Sheffield to save Huddersfield.

While what has gone on with London is not right IMO you can hardly say what has gone one before is much different.

Dave

Re: london broncos

Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:29 pm
by GeoffN
DaveO posted:
The Black Pearl posted:
If it was any team but the Aussie's they would have been out of business.
Not true.

Gateshead were sacrificed to save Hull and Sheffield to save Huddersfield.

While what has gone on with London is not right IMO you can hardly say what has gone one before is much different.

Dave
True, DaveO, but the RFL have been making such a fuss over clubs' finances in the last few years, with 'Framing the Future' and salary capping, in order to prevent similar examples happening again. Clearly it hasn't worked.
The 'removal' of the debt is peculiar enough, but then to allow them to sign Vinnie Andersen for 3 years, who won't exactly be cheap, is bizarre.