Page 3 of 8
Re: Hardaker
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 6:32 pm
by KOOCH
Also noticed on twitter that it was hinted Hardaker to us with Micky Mac going the other way.That's if I read it correctly.Would not mind seeing Zac in a wigan shirt but not at the expense of MM.
Re: Hardaker
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 6:39 pm
by josie andrews
KOOCH wrote:Also noticed on twitter that it was hinted Hardaker to us with Micky Mac going the other way.That's if I read it correctly.Would not mind seeing Zac in a wigan shirt but not at the expense of MM.
I've heard that too, hope it doesn't come off don't want to lose Mickey Mac-Zac
Re: Hardaker
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 7:13 pm
by TrueBlueWarrior
Why on Earth would Leeds want MM after just signing Aiton on a 3 year deal as well, MM will not leave us.
Re: Hardaker
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 7:22 pm
by Kittwazzer
TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Why on Earth would Leeds want MM after just signing Aiton on a 3 year deal as well, MM will not leave us.
I'd certainly hope not. Micky is as good a hooker as any in Super League!
Re: Hardaker
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 11:46 pm
by Kaii
KOOCH wrote:Also noticed on twitter that it was hinted Hardaker to us with Micky Mac going the other way.That's if I read it correctly.Would not mind seeing Zac in a wigan shirt but not at the expense of MM.
IMO this is just the Leeds lot trying to start their own rumor up to save face losing Zak to us, why would Micky Mac leave us. Maybe in a big NRL side came in but not to the Leeds scum
Re: Hardaker
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:05 am
by Kaii
From the rlfans leeds page
http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php? ... #p17625165
I have been told from a good source Zack had a meeting with GH yesterday to request a transfer I havent been told where to only that he doesnt want to be a Rhinos player anymore will be gutted if this happens
It is the same source that told me Briscoe had signed a 5yr deal in May and also that Hood had asked for a release so it doesnt look good
Re: Hardaker
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:14 am
by Kittwazzer
Ive heard that he is due to release his own statement within the next 48 hours.
Re: Hardaker
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:20 am
by Owd Codger
The Independent like other 'broadsheets' being run by RU orientated staff being hardly supportive of our game and will latch on to anything to try and discredit it.
Perhaps, if they give our game the better coverage it deserves, our supporters would have more respect for their newspapers, and you never know might even buy a copy.
Re: Hardaker
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:44 am
by cpwigan
Whelley Warrior wrote:
The Independent like other 'broadsheets' being run by RU orientated staff being hardly supportive of our game and will latch on to anything to try and discredit it.
Perhaps, if they give our game the better coverage it deserves, our supporters would have more respect for their newspapers, and you never know might even buy a copy.
Do not blame the media WW. They are often in the wrong but not so on this occasion. Even the RL Media have been atognised / p-off by McNamara. Lockwood the Editor of one of the Monday papers wrote a very good piece about the antics of McNamara bringing the WC into disrepute.
Re: Hardaker
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 9:25 am
by The Eclipse
cpwigan wrote:
Do not blame the media WW. They are often in the wrong but not so on this occasion. Even the RL Media have been atognised / p-off by McNamara. Lockwood the Editor of one of the Monday papers wrote a very good piece about the antics of McNamara bringing the WC into disrepute.
The interview i saw w/Tanya Arnold i think it was, was an absolute disgrace.