Sean Gleeson

[josie andrews]

I know two of the men involved and actually work with one of them.

I have heard quite a different story to the sensationalistic one put out by the news.

You as a moderator should know better than comment about something that could prejudice any legal investigations and is set to go to Court in April.

I would hope your prejudiced and biased views get this thread locked before legal machinations take over[/quote]

Pity you was not as passionate about baised prejudised when it was Gas Hock. Are was he fair game.

What the f&&& are you babbling on about you moron?

I never wrote anything about Hock nor had I any preconceived ideas about his "guilt" or "indiscretions" nor anything he had committed prior to being loaned and then sold by Wigan. You should get your facts right before starting to enter threads and writing utter drivel down as if you are correct.

Please refrain from using insulting & abusive terminology aimed at another poster. Thank you

[Wigan_forever1985]

I think its important to keep focus here

Lets stop this name calling because its not big or clever.

BM its clear you have a vested interest in this case but if you read the other posts, other posters aren't saying the book should be thrown at the people in the picture, but the people responsible for this.

The news we have is that 3 men were involved in an altercation with Gleeson - this is information from the police as I understand it.

We are commenting on what we believe to be the story and im sure that if there are more facts available then views may change.

Whichever way you cut it 3 guys on 1 is not big or clever no matter who started it, neither is damaging someones eye socket so bad they may lose their sight

I think this thread should revert to the well wishes we all give to SG rather than name calling amongst ourselves