Page 3 of 5

Re: Dan Sarginson

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 6:45 pm
by thegimble
cpwigan wrote:Who would think somebody would get holier than thou over a rumour. I will say this Josie gets it right 99.9% which is not bad is it.
But she fails 0.1%.

Good Josie is she is no Lockers.

Re: Dan Sarginson

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:13 pm
by cpwigan
keptinthedarkfa​ns​ wrote:Josie regardless of what Sarg told you. your not far off the truth. because this was put out deliberately by his agent to spark a interest down under. I am not a betting man but will bet my life he will not go to gold coast.
KITD makes a great point re agents. They happily spread 'positive' rumours to suit their client and their financial needs.

Re: Dan Sarginson

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:14 pm
by cpwigan
thegimble wrote:
cpwigan wrote:Who would think somebody would get holier than thou over a rumour. I will say this Josie gets it right 99.9% which is not bad is it.
But she fails 0.1%.

Good Josie is she is no Lockers.
Damn right! :wink: She is SL standard though :wink: Me, championship or championship 1 :wink: WW, NWC Div 6 :exc:

Re: Dan Sarginson

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 8:36 am
by Panchitta Marra
To throw the cat in here.

1. Dan Sarginson.
2. Josh Charnley.
3. Anthony Gelling.
4. Oliver Gildart.
5. Dominic Manfredi.
6. Sam Tomkins.
7. George Williams.
Back up at full back with young Tierney, and in the halves with Smith.

Re: Dan Sarginson

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 9:42 am
by Owd Codger
cpwigan wrote:Who would think somebody would get holier than thou over a rumour. I will say this Josie gets it right 99.9% which is not bad is it.
Not bad at all, but on this occasion, sadly in the 0.9%!

There is always room for improvement.

Only joking!


Re: Dan Sarginson

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 11:20 am
by markill
Whelley Warrior wrote:
cpwigan wrote:Who would think somebody would get holier than thou over a rumour. I will say this Josie gets it right 99.9% which is not bad is it.
Not bad at all, but on this occasion, sadly in the 0.9%!

There is always room for improvement.

Only joking!
There is in your maths yeah.

Re: Dan Sarginson

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 2:33 pm
by Wandering Warrior
cpwigan wrote:
keptinthedarkfa​ns​ wrote:Josie regardless of what Sarg told you. your not far off the truth. because this was put out deliberately by his agent to spark a interest down under. I am not a betting man but will bet my life he will not go to gold coast.
KITD makes a great point re agents. They happily spread 'positive' rumours to suit their client and their financial needs.
Pimps run the world!


Re: Dan Sarginson

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 4:58 pm
by cpwigan
markill wrote:
Whelley Warrior wrote:
cpwigan wrote:Who would think somebody would get holier than thou over a rumour. I will say this Josie gets it right 99.9% which is not bad is it.
Not bad at all, but on this occasion, sadly in the 0.9%!

There is always room for improvement.

Only joking!
There is in your maths yeah.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Poor WW :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Dan Sarginson

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:43 am
by Owd Codger
cpwigan wrote:
markill wrote:
Whelley Warrior wrote: Not bad at all, but on this occasion, sadly in the 0.9%!

There is always room for improvement.

Only joking!
There is in your maths yeah.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Poor WW :lol: :lol: :lol:
I agree!

Damm bad show on my part, but these things happen to the best of people.

Re: Dan Sarginson

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:52 am
by cpwigan
They do, me too.