A W O L

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
Panchitta Marra
Posts: 6134
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm

Re: A W O L

Post by Panchitta Marra »

Nezza Faz wrote:
Panchitta Marra wrote:
Nezza Faz wrote: Yeah Billy, I think you're right and £300,000 (or Dollars ?) rings a bell.

I'd imagine Diamond has been playing the "wild card" with this "retirement from League" thing, after all what would happen to him (or any player) if he later wanted to return to rugby league, as a good few already have done, in both the Uk and Australia ?

Be interesting to see what the legal implications of this would be - any lawyers on here ?
Maybe the NRL weren't quick enough on the uptake to suggest Sam was retiring from Yawnion.
The two Aussies going to American football probably won't be questioned as it's a totally different sport, but so is Yawnion to league. I see this scenario as difficult to defend against and maybe players contracts have to be now directed towards protection against retirement and reinstatement into another sport. Where I work, to move between contractors there is a period where the employee has to be away from site for a number of weeks before he/she can restart for another company. This is just a simple control to try and deflect moves and maybe the RFL has to look at secure player contract option wording.

Whichever way it's looked upon, as a non legal person, I'd say it's a fundamental breach of Employment Law. To make it up that you want to retire, any good Barrister will put it if that's what you wanted, you should only have signed a ONE YEAR contract.

I don't think the Courts would look favourably upon those inducing others to break their contract of employment either, whether retirement from the sport is an issue, or not. And most likely, NOT, because the contract is with the Club (Cas in this case), and NOT the sport.
It will be interesting to see how it fully unfolds NF.
thegimble
Posts: 5904
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:09 am

Re: A W O L

Post by thegimble »

Shaun1967 wrote:If Sale get away with this, the RFL should offer Josh Charnley a huge bung to 'retire' from Rugby Union to get him back into our game.
No not Josh they should say have no limit on a union player coming over to league on the cap. Josh is not that important to Union atm. Say get an offer of over a million from Wire or Salford for Owen Farrell or someone of importance.

If Sale get away with this then we need to hit them where it hurts them.
DaveO
Posts: 15918
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 5:32 pm

Re: A W O L

Post by DaveO »

thegimble wrote:
Shaun1967 wrote:If Sale get away with this, the RFL should offer Josh Charnley a huge bung to 'retire' from Rugby Union to get him back into our game.
No not Josh they should say have no limit on a union player coming over to league on the cap. Josh is not that important to Union atm. Say get an offer of over a million from Wire or Salford for Owen Farrell or someone of importance.

If Sale get away with this then we need to hit them where it hurts them.
I doubt Owen Farrell would be interested but a player of lesser importance would do. They need their good players as well as their marquee players and one of them just walking out would make the point it is not in RU's interests to weaken player contracts.

I really hope this goes to court because it is blindingly obvious his "retirement" is just a ruse to break his contract.

Furthermore Sales comments could be interpreted as them endorsing this mechanism to break the contract and a court may even conclude they suggested it!

If there is any justice it ought to cost Sale and Solomona a small fortune.
fozzieskem
Posts: 6494
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am

Re: A W O L

Post by fozzieskem »

I think Dave is right the sport has to fight fire with fire,but with the cap getting in the way of doing this I'm not so sure of how RL could do it.
User avatar
Wigan_forever1985
Posts: 6587
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:50 pm

Re: A W O L

Post by Wigan_forever1985 »

Its a bit of a landmark moment for the sport 3 players have just walked away from clubs and if all 3 get away with it then that's all she wrote for the SuperLeague

The most important one is Dennys case because as stated above Sale have played their hand and almost said "why cant we do this?" and if no one says they cant - then why would anyone pay a transfer fee for a player again. Union can offer inflated wages even at the bottom end for top end league players, experiments will become a lot more viable and sellable to boards of RU clubs
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure
thegimble
Posts: 5904
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:09 am

Re: A W O L

Post by thegimble »

I doubt Owen Farrell would be interested but a player of lesser importance would do. They need their good players as well as their marquee players and one of them just walking out would make the point it is not in RU's interests to weaken player contracts.

The suggestion was a what if scenario. Imagine if RL would weaken the England union side by taking from them players. Its the cap that is stopping one or 2 clubs from doing this. Apart from Saracens union clubs are not that rich compared to say the Warrington owner or even Salford's.

If Sale get away with it RL has to end the cap immediately or at least get it in a manner which lets us fight them on an equal footing for their better players.
User avatar
Wigan_forever1985
Posts: 6587
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:50 pm

Re: A W O L

Post by Wigan_forever1985 »

Sale have apparently registered Denny

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure
morley pie eater
Posts: 3278
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:01 pm

Re: A W O L

Post by morley pie eater »

thegimble wrote:I doubt Owen Farrell would be interested but a player of lesser importance would do. They need their good players as well as their marquee players and one of them just walking out would make the point it is not in RU's interests to weaken player contracts.

The suggestion was a what if scenario. Imagine if RL would weaken the England union side by taking from them players. Its the cap that is stopping one or 2 clubs from doing this. Apart from Saracens union clubs are not that rich compared to say the Warrington owner or even Salford's.

If Sale get away with it RL has to end the cap immediately or at least get it in a manner which lets us fight them on an equal footing for their better players.
The union salary cap is £6.5 million and will rise to £7 million next year. Their average player will be on more than 3 times what an average league player can expect.

Anyone in or with hopes of being in the England rah-rah team would be out of our reach. Even if a club owner was willing to pay a quarter of a million for an average union player, with no guarantee he'd even be average in league, what would be the point? It would hardly have the RU top brass needing to change their Y-fronts.
Wigan ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Saints ⭐⭐⭐
FWarrior
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 8:59 pm

Re: A W O L

Post by FWarrior »

Those supporting the RFL complaint are simply endorsing double standards. Not one fan, nor the RFL complained or attempted to stop top union players such as Davies leaving another sport to play rugby league. Morley Pie Eater is correct. NO England RU international or anyone on the verge are going to give up the far superior salary on offer in Union. The one alternative is to scrap the salary cap. WE certainly need to stop with the hypocrisy.
shaunedwardsfanclub
Posts: 6338
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm

Re: A W O L

Post by shaunedwardsfanclub »

FWarrior wrote:Those supporting the RFL complaint are simply endorsing double standards. Not one fan, nor the RFL complained or attempted to stop top union players such as Davies leaving another sport to play rugby league. Morley Pie Eater is correct. NO England RU international or anyone on the verge are going to give up the far superior salary on offer in Union. The one alternative is to scrap the salary cap. WE certainly need to stop with the hypocrisy.
You are correct FW we need to stop bleating about something we introduced and take action to try and nullify the threat. Then again the RFL may bury its head in the sand again.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
Post Reply