Re: Fans Forum Next Tuesday
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2021 4:55 pm
A site for fans of Wigan Warriors RLFC. News, views, statistics, profiles and more all contributed by supporters of Wigan RL.
https://www.wiganwarriorsfans.com/
DaveO wrote: ↑Tue Aug 24, 2021 3:57 pmThe idea a new coach will revitalise Thornley is fanciful in my opinion. A player of his age has precisely zero amount of improvement left in him. What you see is what you will get and this is a poor signing.Caboosegg wrote: ↑Tue Aug 24, 2021 2:42 pmI mean you just summed up some issues the club face.Dan2266 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 24, 2021 1:26 pm Id be questioning the lack of ambition if anything, why have we accepted mediocrity and stuck with a coach who is clearly not performing.
Why we seem to be reliant on old heads coming back and the jobs for the boys culture.
Why announcements aren't made within a reasonable timescale (Do they already know fans will object to said announcements - Thornley) If that is the case, why are we signing players we know are substandard (That would be a good one to ask if they say they still have ambition to win trophies)
You have no idea how wekl Thornley would do for us, he went alright at catalan and making a judgement based of leigh is like deciding if a player is any good by watching Wigan play at the moment.
Fans have their own view of if a player is good enough not based of stats but their own belief as I don't very few actually sit and watch every game they play at other clubs.
People moaned about not getting NRL props, we get two and already people are finding reasons for them to fail.
Even with Thornley who stats don't back up the random complaints as players change a new coach would do wonders.
I am not sure where this idea he played well for Cats comes from either. He was only there 2017-18 playing 38 games and didn't feature in the CC winning side.
What amazes me is if he'd signed for a club like Wakefield no one on here would bat an eye and if they had any opinion at all it would be of a mid table standard player moving to a mid table club. If Wire or Saints had signed him people would laugh. Yet when he gets here, he's going to turn into the player he's never been.
As to this signing and the fans forum, the question that IL & Rads have to answer is why are the likes of Saints signing the likes of Hopogate who is also 29 while we get Thornley? Do we actually have any scouting going on?
If you are going to sign a back of that age sign one who has proved to be a top class player not one who never did.
Well questions will be needed I expect because it’d be quiet without them.DaveO wrote: ↑Tue Aug 24, 2021 3:36 pmQuestions? Why do they need to be asked questions? They must be deaf and blind if they don't know what the fans concerns are.fozzieskem wrote: ↑Tue Aug 24, 2021 12:18 pm Good,a positive move by the club so long as honest questions are asked and not a room full of apologists for the current state of the club.
A cold hard look is clearly needed at the club and the last thing is needed is soft questions.
The question I'd really like to ask which to them might be one that isn't so obvious as they seem to live in a dream world in this regard which is about the seeming lack of a culture of constant improvement where instead of giving players who are either past it (e.g. Clubb) or not good enough (e.g. Powell) new contracts the club doesn't seek to constantly improve?
I am sure the answer would be related to the salary cap but I can't believe better players than these two have not been available within budget constraints over the time they have been here, which would be my response.
Well you can guess mine from my post above. Why don’t we constantly seek to improve instead of offering older or average players new contracts. You don’t have to mention my examples of Clubb and Powell if you don’t want to offend the players…josie andrews wrote:If anyone has any specific questions & aren’t or can’t attend please let me know & I will ask them for you [emoji4]
He’s being written off because he’s not very good. Not because he’s not an NRL player.Caboosegg wrote:DaveO wrote: ↑Tue Aug 24, 2021 3:57 pmThe idea a new coach will revitalise Thornley is fanciful in my opinion. A player of his age has precisely zero amount of improvement left in him. What you see is what you will get and this is a poor signing.Caboosegg wrote: ↑Tue Aug 24, 2021 2:42 pm I mean you just summed up some issues the club face.
You have no idea how wekl Thornley would do for us, he went alright at catalan and making a judgement based of leigh is like deciding if a player is any good by watching Wigan play at the moment.
Fans have their own view of if a player is good enough not based of stats but their own belief as I don't very few actually sit and watch every game they play at other clubs.
People moaned about not getting NRL props, we get two and already people are finding reasons for them to fail.
Even with Thornley who stats don't back up the random complaints as players change a new coach would do wonders.
I am not sure where this idea he played well for Cats comes from either. He was only there 2017-18 playing 38 games and didn't feature in the CC winning side.
What amazes me is if he'd signed for a club like Wakefield no one on here would bat an eye and if they had any opinion at all it would be of a mid table standard player moving to a mid table club. If Wire or Saints had signed him people would laugh. Yet when he gets here, he's going to turn into the player he's never been.
As to this signing and the fans forum, the question that IL & Rads have to answer is why are the likes of Saints signing the likes of Hopogate who is also 29 while we get Thornley? Do we actually have any scouting going on?
If you are going to sign a back of that age sign one who has proved to be a top class player not one who never did.
Not saying he's going to suddenly become amazing, more as usual because he's not a NRL player he's been written off before he's played a game.
And if you wouldn't bat an eyelid with him signing for another SL team you shouldn't for Wigan, we all have the same Cap to spend (bar leigh)
I'm not going to pick Thornley as a hill to stand on but give the player a chance.
Whilst I don’t think Thornley is a very inspiring signing, I’m not sure Saints are setting the benchmark.DaveO wrote: ↑Tue Aug 24, 2021 3:57 pmThe idea a new coach will revitalise Thornley is fanciful in my opinion. A player of his age has precisely zero amount of improvement left in him. What you see is what you will get and this is a poor signing.Caboosegg wrote: ↑Tue Aug 24, 2021 2:42 pmI mean you just summed up some issues the club face.Dan2266 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 24, 2021 1:26 pm Id be questioning the lack of ambition if anything, why have we accepted mediocrity and stuck with a coach who is clearly not performing.
Why we seem to be reliant on old heads coming back and the jobs for the boys culture.
Why announcements aren't made within a reasonable timescale (Do they already know fans will object to said announcements - Thornley) If that is the case, why are we signing players we know are substandard (That would be a good one to ask if they say they still have ambition to win trophies)
You have no idea how wekl Thornley would do for us, he went alright at catalan and making a judgement based of leigh is like deciding if a player is any good by watching Wigan play at the moment.
Fans have their own view of if a player is good enough not based of stats but their own belief as I don't very few actually sit and watch every game they play at other clubs.
People moaned about not getting NRL props, we get two and already people are finding reasons for them to fail.
Even with Thornley who stats don't back up the random complaints as players change a new coach would do wonders.
I am not sure where this idea he played well for Cats comes from either. He was only there 2017-18 playing 38 games and didn't feature in the CC winning side.
What amazes me is if he'd signed for a club like Wakefield no one on here would bat an eye and if they had any opinion at all it would be of a mid table standard player moving to a mid table club. If Wire or Saints had signed him people would laugh. Yet when he gets here, he's going to turn into the player he's never been.
As to this signing and the fans forum, the question that IL & Rads have to answer is why are the likes of Saints signing the likes of Hopogate who is also 29 while we get Thornley? Do we actually have any scouting going on?
If you are going to sign a back of that age sign one who has proved to be a top class player not one who never did.