Wire v Leeds

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
WarriorWinger
Posts: 262
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2019 4:32 pm

Re: Wire v Leeds

Post by WarriorWinger »

Grace was absolutely awful as a guest, looked like a kid in primary school swinging round on his chair and barely able to string a decent sentence together
josie andrews
Posts: 36041
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: Wire v Leeds

Post by josie andrews »

WarriorWinger wrote: Mon Feb 14, 2022 10:01 am Grace was absolutely awful as a guest, looked like a kid in primary school swinging round on his chair and barely able to string a decent sentence together
I agree, he was the worse guest Sky have had on!
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
WarriorWinger
Posts: 262
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2019 4:32 pm

Re: Wire v Leeds

Post by WarriorWinger »

josie andrews wrote: Mon Feb 14, 2022 12:09 pm
WarriorWinger wrote: Mon Feb 14, 2022 10:01 am Grace was absolutely awful as a guest, looked like a kid in primary school swinging round on his chair and barely able to string a decent sentence together
I agree, he was the worse guest Sky have had on!
I agree, he just had nothing about it at all, why don't they have conversations with players to see how they may come across on camera before inviting them on as guest. They could have just cut to some random kid in the crowd and they would have summarised the answer much better
fozzieskem
Posts: 6494
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am

Re: Wire v Leeds

Post by fozzieskem »

But,but he's amazing that lad!!!!
moto748
Posts: 4716
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 5:30 pm

Re: Wire v Leeds

Post by moto748 »

Whether or not, doesn't make him a feasible pundit. Surely, as WW says, a little research would have shown he wasn't the man for the job? Just makes it look like, as long as they pull in a guy from Saints, it's job done.
fozzieskem
Posts: 6494
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am

Re: Wire v Leeds

Post by fozzieskem »

And the liability that is Bentley gets an extra game for a frivolous challenge to the original ban.
josie andrews
Posts: 36041
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: Wire v Leeds

Post by josie andrews »

https://www.totalrl.com/leeds-rhinos-an ... eals-fail/

Both Bentley & Holmes’s got an extra game added to their sentence

The thing is the inconsistencies in the refereeing.

Bentley got a red for a high shot to the head while Holmes, got a yellow for a high shot to the head!

It’s bad enough the refs differ in how they managed a game from match to match, but in the same game!!

The judiciary panel are no better IMO
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
Post Reply