Page 3 of 3
Re: will brown get in squa...
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:21 pm
by Exiled Wiganer
They are not great, but there is no realistic alternative to playing Orr and Moran at 6 and 7.
Happy with Dallas (or Ashton) at 1 (shame he can't play centre), Richards and Calderwood on the wings. Goulding is our best centre.
Which leaves one centre spot for one of Gleeson/DV/Brown or, possibly, Ashton. If Ashton can play there, I'd play him, then Gleeson, then Brown, then my granny, then DV. What a terrible range of options...
Re: will brown get in squa...
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:04 pm
by mike binder
newtons not coming back
Re: will brown get in squa...
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:23 pm
by Matthew
pie eaters posted:
Why?
because we already have two hookers - who do you see us getting rid of? Higham's contract is for at least a couple of years; unless you don't want to renew Godwin's contract?
Re: will brown get in squa...
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:50 pm
by mike binder
pie eaters posted:
It doesnt matter Newton will be pefect for us and is miles better than Higham and Godwin put together.
what games you been watching :conf:
Re: will brown get in squa...
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:42 pm
by Susi
Oh well there goes the bring back terry party!
I would put orr at 7 drop moran (on his head) put kb at 6. Leave goulding in the centre and chris aston at full back.
Wayne may be good at 6 but brown is no centre.
(actually it's hard to define what he is.)
Not your friend mr binder been promsing me my terry coming back.
Re: will brown get in squa...
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:51 pm
by FROM A TO B
With Dallas being out injured and Calderwood playing, if we end up with a Brown / Calderwood partnership, then it will not take a rocket scientist to work out which side of the field Hull will attack all day!
Think Calderwood will come good with attack, but defence has always been a little suss. KB no comment