Should wigan sign any cas players?

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
User avatar
Bear
Posts: 4224
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:32 pm

Re: Should wigan sign any ...

Post by Bear »

Well we do have others :lol:
OOOOOO were the greatest club in the world!!!!
shawcross da warrior
Posts: 2394
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Should wigan sign any ...

Post by shawcross da warrior »

i think we should get danny brough hes the only one who seems he would be able to slot in at wigan if barrett or anny orr were injured
- psycho -
Posts: 4711
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:08 pm

Re: Should wigan sign any ...

Post by - psycho - »

erm, willie manu aint bad. hard to stop and always keeps on going, good solid second rower. if you remember, he ripped us apart on 2 occassions this season, both home and away.

brough is alright but if we sign luiluia then i don't see a need to bring him along.

im quite a fan of young michael shenton (centre). has a good step and is quite quick. could go far with the right mentor.

only others are really platt (we have ashton) and nutley (if danny comes back, or we bring prec, eamon or a new prop in then he isnt needed).
"what ever happens... we stick together... we stay together... we survive."

-------------------------------------
highland convert
Posts: 2526
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:44 pm

Re: Should wigan sign any ...

Post by highland convert »

Brough cleared well. We were in trouble with a kicker until dobson appeared. Who is picking up that role next year? hc
User avatar
yokozuna
Posts: 1762
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 10:15 am

Re: Should wigan sign any ...

Post by yokozuna »

Brough for his kicking ability, both from a dead ball and in open play.

Otherwise, no one else that would add a great deal to the team - IMHO.

Footballers spend 90 minutes pretending they're injured. Rugby League players spend 80 minutes pretending they're not.
turf
Posts: 5539
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:53 pm

Re: Should wigan sign any ...

Post by turf »

DEFINATELY has to be Danny Brough for me.
LKC29
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:11 pm

Re: Should wigan sign any ...

Post by LKC29 »

medlocke posted:
would be great to see Peter Lupton and Micheal Platt both players have a good step, as Platt showed tonight he can break the line. I feel if lupton was to play under a good coach he would become a top class player
Luppy for wigan!!!!! I know luppy and that would be a dream come true as he is a life long wigan fan! But where would he fit in as he is a natural half back?
bertina
Posts: 924
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:29 pm

Re: Should wigan sign any ...

Post by bertina »

ancientnloyal posted:
No, none of them. Fielden... Barrett... etc... IMO none of the current castleford players fit into Wigans plans

I agree. If we are serious about challenging fo silverware next season, we need better players than Cas can offer.
medlocke
Posts: 10921
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:57 am
Location: Millom
Contact:

Re: Should wigan sign any ...

Post by medlocke »

LKC29 posted:
medlocke posted:
would be great to see Peter Lupton and Micheal Platt both players have a good step, as Platt showed tonight he can break the line. I feel if lupton was to play under a good coach he would become a top class player
Luppy for wigan!!!!! I know luppy and that would be a dream come true as he is a life long wigan fan! But where would he fit in as he is a natural half back?
I played Junior league for his Dad Dumpy way back in the early 80s along with the likes of Phil Jackson. Would love to see him play for this great club, I know this will probably cause a big argument but, Lupton isnt affraid to attack the line unlike a certain player who shall remain nameless, as we have seen when he played for Broncos/hull he showed the potential he has got on many occasions :wink:
FEILDEN FOR KEEPERS
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:00 am

Re: Should wigan sign any ...

Post by FEILDEN FOR KEEPERS »

richard faoso and brough would be great at wigan
Post Reply