Page 3 of 3
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:26 pm
by Bear
Well we do have others
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:31 pm
by shawcross da warrior
i think we should get danny brough hes the only one who seems he would be able to slot in at wigan if barrett or anny orr were injured
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:48 pm
by - psycho -
erm, willie manu aint bad. hard to stop and always keeps on going, good solid second rower. if you remember, he ripped us apart on 2 occassions this season, both home and away.
brough is alright but if we sign luiluia then i don't see a need to bring him along.
im quite a fan of young michael shenton (centre). has a good step and is quite quick. could go far with the right mentor.
only others are really platt (we have ashton) and nutley (if danny comes back, or we bring prec, eamon or a new prop in then he isnt needed).
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 3:11 pm
by highland convert
Brough cleared well. We were in trouble with a kicker until dobson appeared. Who is picking up that role next year? hc
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:58 pm
by yokozuna
Brough for his kicking ability, both from a dead ball and in open play.
Otherwise, no one else that would add a great deal to the team - IMHO.
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:13 am
by turf
DEFINATELY has to be Danny Brough for me.
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:24 am
by LKC29
medlocke posted:
would be great to see Peter Lupton and Micheal Platt both players have a good step, as Platt showed tonight he can break the line. I feel if lupton was to play under a good coach he would become a top class player
Luppy for wigan!!!!! I know luppy and that would be a dream come true as he is a life long wigan fan! But where would he fit in as he is a natural half back?
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 10:13 am
by bertina
ancientnloyal posted:
No, none of them. Fielden... Barrett... etc... IMO none of the current castleford players fit into Wigans plans
I agree. If we are serious about challenging fo silverware next season, we need better players than Cas can offer.
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:21 pm
by medlocke
LKC29 posted:
medlocke posted:
would be great to see Peter Lupton and Micheal Platt both players have a good step, as Platt showed tonight he can break the line. I feel if lupton was to play under a good coach he would become a top class player
Luppy for wigan!!!!! I know luppy and that would be a dream come true as he is a life long wigan fan! But where would he fit in as he is a natural half back?
I played Junior league for his Dad Dumpy way back in the early 80s along with the likes of Phil Jackson. Would love to see him play for this great club, I know this will probably cause a big argument but, Lupton isnt affraid to attack the line unlike a certain player who shall remain nameless, as we have seen when he played for Broncos/hull he showed the potential he has got on many occasions
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:26 pm
by FEILDEN FOR KEEPERS
richard faoso and brough would be great at wigan