Page 4 of 5

Re: NO, NO, NO! Sweet Lord...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 4:33 pm
by luke_robinsons_angel
- psycho - posted:
luke_robinsons_ angel posted:
well then the same can be said for any players of any sport, it obviously hasn't affected any of their games.
oh yeah? ask Tickle.
you have only mentioned 1 as i can see, and obviously one more which fraggle has removed, that only makes 2, you first implied a whole team.

Re: NO, NO, NO! Sweet Lord...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:15 pm
by - psycho -
luke_robinsons_ angel posted:
- psycho - posted:
luke_robinsons_ angel posted:
well then the same can be said for any players of any sport, it obviously hasn't affected any of their games.
oh yeah? ask Tickle.
you have only mentioned 1 as i can see, and obviously one more which fraggle has removed, that only makes 2, you first implied a whole team.
ok, the whole team liked to knock some back. sometiems its ahrmless if you'll perform on the pitch like connoly. he was a heavy drinker but he was a good player.

however, these alds were knocking them back all aronud wigan, and were they performing? where they balls. they were rock bottom.

to say alcohol doesnt effect your game is ludicrous and tunnel visioned.

millward had no control.

Re: NO, NO, NO! Sweet Lord...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:18 pm
by - psycho -
luke_robinsons_ angel posted:
you first implied a whole team.
and i didn't imply a hole team, i implied half of the team, which was true.

Re: NO, NO, NO! Sweet Lord...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:20 pm
by jinkin jimmy
- psycho - posted:
luke_robinsons_ angel posted:
- psycho - posted: oh yeah? ask Tickle.
you have only mentioned 1 as i can see, and obviously one more which fraggle has removed, that only makes 2, you first implied a whole team.
ok, the whole team liked to knock some back. sometiems its ahrmless if you'll perform on the pitch like connoly. he was a heavy drinker but he was a good player.

however, these alds were knocking them back all aronud wigan, and were they performing? where they balls. they were rock bottom.

to say alcohol doesnt effect your game is ludicrous and tunnel visioned.

millward had no control.
What was he supposed to do? Lock them up?

Re: NO, NO, NO! Sweet Lord...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:24 pm
by gpartin
Biggest drinker I've ever seen, rugby player or otherwise is Karl Harrison. Once saw him down 26(!!!) pints of Carling Premier in about 3 1/2 hours and he was still completely compus mentus before I left. He was ordering them 3 and 4 at a time.

Re: NO, NO, NO! Sweet Lord...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:08 pm
by - psycho -
it's because i type so quick, and i don't ABC my posts, which i should hahaha sometimes the spellings come out and they are bizarre.

Re: NO, NO, NO! Sweet Lord...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 9:12 pm
by medlocke
- psycho - posted:
it's because i type so quick, and i don't ABC my posts, which i should hahaha sometimes the spellings come out and they are bizarre.
I have exactly the same problem, except i can't type fast and have cigar fingers :lol:

Re: NO, NO, NO! Sweet Lord...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:22 pm
by luke_robinsons_angel
- psycho - posted:
ok, the whole team liked to knock some back. sometiems its ahrmless if you'll perform on the pitch like connoly. he was a heavy drinker but he was a good player.

however, these alds were knocking them back all aronud wigan, and were they performing? where they balls. they were rock bottom.
i think you've been on the lash with spelling like that.


Re: NO, NO, NO! Sweet Lord...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:20 pm
by - psycho -
no need for the digs, i spelt abotu 4 words wrong, it's hard to spell every word right when you don't look at your keys and can type all that out in seconds.

Re: NO, NO, NO! Sweet Lord...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:31 pm
by Banksy
I thought I left my last ever English class room last year.