WiganWarriorsFans.com

MrDave wrote:

wall_of_voodoo wrote: Are you a barrister? (I admit that I am not - however....) There are many forms of charges for injury and reckless gbh is the lowest (gbh with intent coming next), so it is likely his defence will plead either provocation or lack of responsibility under the grounds that he was "under the influence". Either way, with his gf refusing to make a statement, the police (and prosecution service) will have very little to "go on" imo (very similar to feka, with the person involved dropping chrges, yet feka being still charged with evidence taken from witnesses and cctv - only getting community service).

As for 10 years for NOT MURDERING someone - is this likely? Even in australia??? I think to many episodes of morse have been watched by someone

Offenses Against the person go in this order: Assault, Battery, ABH, GBH, GBH with intent obvious GBH with intent is the most serious. If the Australian legal system is the same as the English then he cannot use provacation as that is only a defence to murder and being under the influence is not a defence to crimes committed recklessly because you are reckless to become under the influence, it would be a defence to GBH with intent which would be reduced to reckless GBH.

On another note, the Daily Express this morning has the story that Wigan have made an offer for Greg Bird which is a cash and player exchange offer, the player being exchanged is Cameron Phelps.

wall_of_voodoo wrote: Irrespective, their is no formulae that would give bird a possible jail sentence, even a ten year one as you intimate might be possible. I very seriously doubt that any jail term will be forthcoming - more likely fined (and if it exists in australia) some sort of community service if he is found guilty, and the reports coming from australia at the moment seem that any action will be hardly the death sentence some on here predicted for him when this "bad boy" was first linked with wigan

mike binder wrote:wigan cant afford him ,the wire have loads of room to keep him under there cap as they dont have a limit

TWO EYED WARRIOR wrote:Will he get a visa and like wise will he be able to enter the UK whilst under investigation ?

MrDave wrote:

TWO EYED WARRIOR wrote:Will he get a visa and like wise will he be able to enter the UK whilst under investigation ?

If he has a trial date set it suggests he has already been arrested, charged and then released until the trial.

He is innocent until proven guilty so there is nothing the police in Australia or England can do to stop him moving country. Since he has not been convicted of any crime yet he will probably pass the criminal record section on the visa application form.

The police could ask a judge to impose a travel restriction on Greg Bird but they would have to produce some evidence to suggest he might not return for his trial or that they still need him for further investigation. So as long as he returns for he trial he is free to go whether he likes, after the trial it all depends on whether he is found guilty or not guilty.

shaunedwardsfan club wrote:Are we interested or not in signing Mr Bird? It depends on which paper you read - Express or Independent! There is obviously something happening behind the scenes though. It looks as though Roberts will be annonced as a new signing in the next few days, after Carmont's Samoan passport is received and Smith's return will depend on whether we can sign a suitable replacement.