WiganWarriorsFans.com

cpwigan wrote:Richards > Phelps > Nobby's Girl > Mathers

Nobby's Girl>Phelps... She has put in two good performances in her time at Wigan.

gpartin wrote:

cpwigan wrote:Richards > Phelps > Nobby's Girl > Mathers

Nobby's Girl>Phelps... She has put in two good performances in her time at Wigan.

Not sure GP her passing was a bit off in the first game. I just wish she would be more fan friendly. She does not really interact with the crowd. Even Mathers did that. You would think she would show herself a little more, express her personality.

cpwigan wrote:

gpartin wrote:

cpwigan wrote:Richards > Phelps > Nobby's Girl > Mathers

Nobby's Girl>Phelps... She has put in two good performances in her time at Wigan.

Not sure GP her passing was a bit off in the first game. I just wish she would be more fan friendly. She does not really interact with the crowd. Even Mathers did that. You would think she would show herself a little more, express her personality.

Ok I'll give you that. Nobby's Girl = Phelps ... and I claim my £5

cpwigan wrote:

gpartin wrote:

cpwigan wrote:Richards > Phelps > Nobby's Girl > Mathers

Nobby's Girl>Phelps... She has put in two good performances in her time at Wigan.

Not sure GP her passing was a bit off in the first game. I just wish she would be more fan friendly. She does not really interact with the crowd. Even Mathers did that. You would think she would show herself a little more, express her personality.

She's very quiet and shy, though, don't forget...there were times during the game yesterday when I could hardly hear her (from 50 yards away).

Don't say that Geoff they'll never drop her.

GeoffN wrote:

cpwigan wrote:

gpartin wrote: Nobby's Girl>Phelps... She has put in two good performances in her time at Wigan.

Not sure GP her passing was a bit off in the first game. I just wish she would be more fan friendly. She does not really interact with the crowd. Even Mathers did that. You would think she would show herself a little more, express her personality.

She's very quiet and shy, though, don't forget...

I will email the club and suggest they put a trampoline in her box so she can bounce up and halfway out of the box to pass her ball.

Richards !!! enough said !!! :conf:

Lucky 13 you obviously dont know what your talking about, how the hell can you justify that if tommy doesnt go to hooker he needs to be shipped off ? ? haha he is probably by far one of our best go forward attackers and not to bad in defence, get a grip lol

stjudes02 wrote:Lucky 13 you obviously dont know what your talking about, how the hell can you justify that if tommy doesnt go to hooker he needs to be shipped off ? ? haha he is probably by far one of our best go forward attackers and not to bad in defence, get a grip lol

You may be rite, I have not got a clue welcome to my club, glad I found someone of a like mind!
I like Lulu but he can not get the team around the field, he had all the field position a quality half needs to win the game against Saints but he could not do it. Why if he was such a talent at half did BennetT and Kearney move him to hooker it must be because they dont have a clue either?
My reason for saying he must go to 9 or leave is because we need to keep S Tomkins unless Lulu shows me somthing he has failed to up to now in being able to organise then I can only see that option.
I do think he could make a great hooker and one who could play a large chunk of the game, he's already won a world cup in the position just hope the ones in power can see it unlike your good self.

lucky 13 wrote:

stjudes02 wrote:Lucky 13 you obviously dont know what your talking about, how the hell can you justify that if tommy doesnt go to hooker he needs to be shipped off ? ? haha he is probably by far one of our best go forward attackers and not to bad in defence, get a grip lol

You may be rite, I have not got a clue welcome to my club, glad I found someone of a like mind!
I like Lulu but he can not get the team around the field, he had all the field position a quality half needs to win the game against Saints but he could not do it. Why if he was such a talent at half did BennetT and Kearney move him to hooker it must be because they dont have a clue either?
My reason for saying he must go to 9 or leave is because we need to keep S Tomkins unless Lulu shows me somthing he has failed to up to now in being able to organise then I can only see that option.
I do think he could make a great hooker and one who could play a large chunk of the game, he's already won a world cup in the position just hope the ones in power can see it unlike your good self.

I agree with Lucky on this one and I know for a fact Tommy wants to go to 9. Had we blooded Sam last season we may have realised we could play Lu Lu at 9 and have no need to sign Riddell.

If people are happy with Sam. I can tell you he is not half the players he can be when he gets to play on the left side.