Michael Maguire

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
Kittwazzer
Posts: 11308
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm

Re: Michael Maguire

Post by Kittwazzer »

exile in Tiger country wrote:
That's Australians for you, I guessing he'll either be Mick or Mike over here, although if he's as good as he promises to be "Lord Maguire of Wigan" might be a better nick-name
I like the sound of that. And it would definitely be one in the eye for Whelan!! :lol:
slimshady
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 1:04 am

Re: Michael Maguire

Post by slimshady »

Lets go back to winter rugby so we can start now, I cant wait till the new year!
Panchitta Marra
Posts: 6134
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm

Re: Michael Maguire

Post by Panchitta Marra »

DaveO wrote:A poster by the name of Norweb posted the following in rlfans about MM:

hi ya,

I am a first time poster, long time reader to the cherry and white forum.

I live in Australia. Locally I'm a big Rooster fan (crap year, don't mention it) who wishes that we got Madge rather than Brian Smith.

But you got him, and we didn't, so i thought i'd give you a Sydney understanding of why Maguire is so highly considered and why i'm gutted.

Firstly he is a coach for whom every player wants to play for.
Secondly, he is fitness and discipline focused.
Thirdly his style is to build pressure and to "pull the trigger" only when necessary. this style doesn't need flashy halves or any particular position to be overplayed. the toilers can contribute as well as the special talents. as a fan i like this becuase at Easts we have a board that keeps trying to buy success with lots of poor recruitment choices to fill in the gaps created by poor coaching styles.
Fourthly, his columns in Big League have been a revelation for us fans. he writes about difficult topics such as bench use and defense patterns really simply.
reason Five, he seems to be an easy going bloke on TV which is a change from grumpy paternal figures like Brian Smith.
Reason 6, Maguire, Bellamy and Kearney have pushed the idea that coaching is a total organisation job. everything starts and ends with the coaching staff - front office, recruitment, fitness, community relations, fans involvement, specialist skills, eduication and welfare - they are all the domain of the head coach. a club wins a championship, a team only wins a game. thats the sort of motto we want at Easts (but aren't now going to get).
and finally becuase he has a reputation quite simply of being the cleverest bloke in Australia for tactics. at the Storm he was the attacking coach (not the backs coach as others have written). the Storm playbook is his invention, Bellamy confirmed that a few weeks ago on a radio interview. did you see the semi final of Storm versus Broncos? there was about 3 backline moves that had any league fan cheering. just clever stuff.

so, does any of this guarantee success - nup. Nothing guarantees success, but what we Easts fans want is a guy to shape the young lives and the old club into a coherent unified high performance culture. and thats what you'll get with MM. and its what i don't thijnk we'll now get at Easts with Bwian.

The Storm are a ridiculous young club. barely 12 years old. Yet their players play for each other and their jersey more than my club which is 102 years old. Thats the Bennett Way. Thats the Bellamy way. And now thats the Maguire way. and now, i dare say, that'll be the Wigan way.

Brian Smith assistants are the biggest faction of coaches out there.

Wayne Bennett assistants are the highest quality faction of coaches out there. Bellamy, Henjak, Maguire, Kearney.

Good luck to the C&W's next year. I'll be cheering from Sydney for youse all.
Looks like our future is on the up.
I like everything about what this East's fan has to say.
In a nutshell, he is disappointed that the Roosters have missed out on Michael McGuire for Brian Smith.
This is the Brian Smith that set the Bradford Bulls on their trail of success.
Thanks also CP for the BBC Radio Manchester link regarding The Warriors, IL, MM & SW. I sat up to 2:30 this morning listening to it.
I cant wait for next season to begin.
Exiled Wiganer
Posts: 2785
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 1:18 pm

Re: Michael Maguire

Post by Exiled Wiganer »

I am not afraid to say that the quote from that Aussie brought a tear to my eye. He sounds like everything we could have hoped for. He has such talent at his disposal that I simply can't wait to see the next 3 years unfold...
Assuming he can get the fatties to fitness, is it fanciful to imagine a team like this in a couple of years?
Veivers - Ainscough - Gleeson - Pryce - Thornley
Tomkins - Mellor
Davies - MMc - Prescott - Hock - Mossop - Lockers
with Farrell, Hansen, Joel, Holland etc etc in the wings?
I was also very pleased to hear IL talking about not signing players yet as they had to be the coach's choices... don't be surprised if we sign a couple of young no name Aussies/Kiwis/Islanders who will be a bit special, or even the young Brit who starred in their reserve triumph last week (Widdop?)...
Panchitta Marra
Posts: 6134
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm

Re: Michael Maguire

Post by Panchitta Marra »

Exiled Wiganer wrote:I am not afraid to say that the quote from that Aussie brought a tear to my eye. He sounds like everything we could have hoped for. He has such talent at his disposal that I simply can't wait to see the next 3 years unfold...
Assuming he can get the fatties to fitness, is it fanciful to imagine a team like this in a couple of years?
Veivers - Ainscough - Gleeson - Pryce - Thornley
Tomkins - Mellor
Davies - MMc - Prescott - Hock - Mossop - Lockers
with Farrell, Hansen, Joel, Holland etc etc in the wings?
I was also very pleased to hear IL talking about not signing players yet as they had to be the coach's choices... don't be surprised if we sign a couple of young no name Aussies/Kiwis/Islanders who will be a bit special, or even the young Brit who starred in their reserve triumph last week (Widdop?)...
As you say Exile, it was very pleasing to hear that IL had backed off from making signings, until a suitable coach was in place to make those choices. It wouldnt suprise me now either to see one or two calculated signings for 2010.
Post Reply