Page 4 of 4
Re: Karl Pryce
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 12:56 am
by josie andrews
What disappointed me about Karl Pryce, was when he played in the Reserve GF.
All the lads had a meal at the stadium before going out on the town. Karl didn't stay for the meal or went out with the lads to celebrate. This appears to me that he is not a 'team' player
Re: Karl Pryce
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:27 am
by Susi
Although i partly agree with IL about slating players not being constructive, (if i'm slated i'll just think blow it i'll not bother if my best not good enough).
I have to say having seen a few reserves matches this season with KP in the team, he does go missing does not tackle or make many yards, what annoys me is he runs around with his hands on hips doing nowt much. he gets paid for that if i stood round like that i'd get a warning and i'd be docked pay. (Fully deserved too).I can't beleive he's the same lad who played for bradford, somet has gone very amiss.
Re: Karl Pryce
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 11:20 am
by slimshady
Is this correct about Pryce being the second fastest player on our books SEFC. Who is our fastest, as it was a sperate thread some weeks ago.[/quote]
I think you mean to the Pie Shop!!
Re: Karl Pryce
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:02 pm
by weststand-rich
No. Noooooo. No way.
I refuse to believe that he's the second fastest player on our books. You're telling me he's faster than Phelps, Richards, Ainscough, Carmont......
Are you teasing? :eh:
Re: Karl Pryce
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:07 pm
by DaveO
jackoh wrote:For some unknown reason known only to IL, we have him for another season , what a joke .
He was given a contract with an option of another year
and the option could be exercised by
either the club or the player. Calderwood had the same sort of contract and also exercised his option for another year here.
Dave
Re: Karl Pryce
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:13 am
by butt monkey
DaveO wrote:jackoh wrote:For some unknown reason known only to IL, we have him for another season , what a joke .
He was given a contract with an option of another year
and the option could be exercised by
either the club or the player. Calderwood had the same sort of contract and also exercised his option for another year here.
Dave
Whereas George Carmont has an option for another year yet wants to change it to a two year deal instead of exercising the option
Re: Karl Pryce
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 7:58 pm
by DaveO
butt monkey wrote:DaveO wrote:jackoh wrote:For some unknown reason known only to IL, we have him for another season , what a joke .
He was given a contract with an option of another year
and the option could be exercised by
either the club or the player. Calderwood had the same sort of contract and also exercised his option for another year here.
Dave
Whereas George Carmont has an option for another year yet wants to change it to a two year deal instead of exercising the option
To the best of my knowledge the option was only in the clubs favour.
In any case even it is was an option that could be exercised by either party, isn't it strange how a player many consider poor snaps up the option to stay but a good one has other options!
Dave
Dave
Re: Karl Pryce
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:14 pm
by Kittwazzer
DaveO wrote:
isn't it strange how a player many consider poor snaps up the option to stay but a good one has other options!
No
Re: Karl Pryce
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:07 am
by ancientnloyal
Kittwazzer wrote:DaveO wrote:
isn't it strange how a player many consider poor snaps up the option to stay but a good one has other options!
No
ie Carmont.