Which of course, Brett Finch doesn't have!exile in Tiger country wrote:
Only for those of very limited intelligence. Planning for the future is something everyone has to do, especially those with a family to think of.
Actually I think the limited intelligence argument works the other way, as you take what you are offered if it is good enough.
To draw an analogy; Let's suppose somebody offers me 50k a year for two years, or 40k a year for two years with a 'possibility' that I may get some extra work after it. The first is a concrete offer based on a definite sum. The second a much lower offer with some attached fantasy.
At the end of the two years I will have 20k more in the bank, I may actually in that two years be proven to be so good at my job that other offers come up. There's a chance they wont, but then again if I take the 40k, there's a chance the fantasy wont turn to reality, and I'll be 20k worse off.
So imho, the original argument is still good: There is subtle difference to the questions "What contract are you after?" and "What can we do to make you stay". Make the right offer and he stays.
Too late now of course