Page 4 of 4

Re: NRL Prop

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:57 am
by Warriors Forever
Taylor's wage will be nowhere near as much as Lima

And Blake Green will be a high earner

Re: NRL Prop

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:05 pm
by shaunedwardsfanclub
highland convert wrote:An increment is a percentage. It would take massive increases to use just one of the top earners wages. Like for like who in that group would be classed in the top earners league. Thornley is unproven, Smith is middle to top rather than top, Green again middle and Taylor possibly one for one with Lima. There still has to be money in the kitty. Jim
Comments on a postcard to IFL.

I am giving you the facts. When players are getting incremental increases, some in the region of £25k it soon eats into the budget. Others, such as Charnley, who were relatively low paid, have now been rewarded for their success.

Re: NRL Prop

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:06 pm
by shaunedwardsfanclub
Warriors Forever wrote:Taylor's wage will be nowhere near as much as Lima

And Blake Green will be a high earner
How do you know that?

Re: NRL Prop

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:55 pm
by Warriors Forever
Your telling me Taylors wage , a unproven 21 year old will be higher than Lima?

Re: NRL Prop

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 8:39 pm
by the winky one
rdownes9 wrote:James Graham??? Is that to add some 'bite' into our team????


:omg: :omg: ...ha ha.....heeee!

Re: NRL Prop

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:10 pm
by ste lord
the winky one wrote:
rdownes9 wrote:James Graham??? Is that to add some 'bite' into our team????


:omg: :omg: ...ha ha.....heeee!
Ear ear :roll: