Page 4 of 10

Re: Bob Beswick

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:32 am
by cpwigan
Play Powell, give the 2 youngsters odd chances from the bench.

Re: Bob Beswick

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 6:36 pm
by joeb
Correct CP be better with Allan beswick

Re: Bob Beswick

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:25 pm
by shaunedwardsfanclub
cpwigan wrote:Play Powell, give the 2 youngsters odd chances from the bench.
I agree let's see what they are made of, it's no use promoting these guys unless they are going to be given a chance to prove themselves. Unfortunately, Luke will not be fit for a couple of weeks.

Re: Bob Beswick

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 7:57 am
by Owd Codger
The postion of Hooker or Dummy Half is a important key postion and therefore with the loss of Mcllorum for the season, we need to sign a good experienced specialist Hooker, even if it is only on a one year contract.

Epecting a Scrum Half who has only filling in as replacement hooker for part of a game together with a Rookie who only got into the Under 19 squad last season is not the answer as far as I am concerned.


Re: Bob Beswick

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 3:17 pm
by thegimble
Whelley Warrior wrote:The postion of Hooker or Dummy Half is a important key postion and therefore with the loss of Mcllorum for the season, we need to sign a good experienced specialist Hooker, even if it is only on a one year contract.

Epecting a Scrum Half who has only filling in as replacement hooker for part of a game together with a Rookie who only got into the Under 19 squad last season is not the answer as far as I am concerned.
I agree

Re: Bob Beswick

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 5:42 pm
by shaunedwardsfanclub
Whelley Warrior wrote:The postion of Hooker or Dummy Half is a important key postion and therefore with the loss of Mcllorum for the season, we need to sign a good experienced specialist Hooker, even if it is only on a one year contract.

Epecting a Scrum Half who has only filling in as replacement hooker for part of a game together with a Rookie who only got into the Under 19 squad last season is not the answer as far as I am concerned.
Can you please provide some names WW? Easier said than done.

Re: Bob Beswick

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 6:52 pm
by Mike
Maybe we can get Sinfield to switch codes? He's played a bit of stand in hooker. Solving our hooker and kicker problems in one go for the year.

Re: Bob Beswick

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 7:31 pm
by Wiganer Ted
Powell was brilliant starting at 9 in the 0-28 win at Wire last year. He won us the game at Hudds when he played the whole 2nd 40 mins and ran the Giants ragged.
It's how we interchange the 9 position more than the personnell involved.

Beswick's ship sailed end of 2005 when Millward unloaded him for Micky Higham who was going to win us everything.
That worked out well didn't it?


Re: Bob Beswick

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2016 6:42 am
by Owd Codger
shaunedwardsfan​club​ wrote:
Whelley Warrior wrote:The postion of Hooker or Dummy Half is a important key postion and therefore with the loss of Mcllorum for the season, we need to sign a good experienced specialist Hooker, even if it is only on a one year contract.

Epecting a Scrum Half who has only filling in as replacement hooker for part of a game together with a Rookie who only got into the Under 19 squad last season is not the answer as far as I am concerned.
Can you please provide some names WW? Easier said than done.
Why should I have to provide names when clubs have more information on the availibility of players be it in this country or down under?

Re: Bob Beswick

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:53 am
by shaunedwardsfanclub
Whelley Warrior wrote:
shaunedwardsfan​club​ wrote:
Whelley Warrior wrote:The postion of Hooker or Dummy Half is a important key postion and therefore with the loss of Mcllorum for the season, we need to sign a good experienced specialist Hooker, even if it is only on a one year contract.

Epecting a Scrum Half who has only filling in as replacement hooker for part of a game together with a Rookie who only got into the Under 19 squad last season is not the answer as far as I am concerned.
Can you please provide some names WW? Easier said than done.
Why should I have to provide names when clubs have more information on the availibility of players be it in this country or down under?
Because your suggesting that the club should do it, therefore I think it is reasonable to think that you have players in mind. By the way every player is available if the club can afford the transfer fee and players wages. Come on WW who would you target?