WiganWarriorsFans.com

Unless any existing players are released I personally think we are done for 2017 but Brad is far more knowledgeable than I am a. A versatile back like Eastmond would be great BUT he will be damn expensive whomever he signs for.

having given debuts to 8 academy players this season , and presumably more youngsters to be given contracts (?), I cant see how the squad isn't too big.

Shouldnt we look after players we got before signing anybodyelse.there is a certain player in first team who wants more money but he was rejected and could leave the club

moto748 wrote:

ddtftf wrote:There are complications with Eastman, as the RFU pays part of his salary.

That's pretty good business from Bath's point of view, then, as Eastmond looks well away from the England set-up these days.

So the RFU will in effect subsidise clubs who want to poach players from league? Charming.

Can you imagine the RFL doing likewise?

fozzieskem wrote:

moto748 wrote:

ddtftf wrote:There are complications with Eastman, as the RFU pays part of his salary.

That's pretty good business from Bath's point of view, then, as Eastmond looks well away from the England set-up these days.

So the RFU will in effect subsidise clubs who want to poach players from league? Charming.

Can you imagine the RFL doing likewise?

They did once for 2 players. Rads and KFC.

With the profit they now make they need to put a bit in to keep the best players in SL.

thegimble wrote:

fozzieskem wrote:

moto748 wrote:
So the RFU will in effect subsidise clubs who want to poach players from league? Charming.

Can you imagine the RFL doing likewise?

They did once for 2 players. Rads and KFC.

With the profit they now make they need to put a bit in to keep the best players in SL.

RFL profit isn't that high after Nigel's Lunch Allowances have been paid!

Kittwazzer wrote:

thegimble wrote:

fozzieskem wrote: Can you imagine the RFL doing likewise?

They did once for 2 players. Rads and KFC.

With the profit they now make they need to put a bit in to keep the best players in SL.

RFL profit isn't that high after Nigel's Lunch Allowances have been paid!

No profit after that.

eccywarrior wrote:Shouldnt we look after players we got before signing anybodyelse.there is a certain player in first team who wants more money but he was rejected and could leave the club

Who?