If We Lose Tonight
Re: If We Lose Tonight
Marshall is a shining light though.
Footballers spend 90 minutes pretending they're injured. Rugby League players spend 80 minutes pretending they're not.
Re: If We Lose Tonight
He is not doing OK. He is part of the problem. His subs for Wakey turned the game in their favour, he subs by the clock and seems to think regardless of who is on the bench they are as good as those out long term injured such as FLower and Clubb.VR46 wrote:I'm sure the Wane debate was in full swing about this time last season
Then we won the Grand Final and became Wold Club Champions
Who should replace him? Who can get the under 19's and a busted squad winning matches again? No easy task, Wane is doing ok and he'll be hurting every bit as much as we are :exc:
He is asking inexperienced players to play as seasoned pros and quite clearly simply cannot adapt his tactics when they can't.
Turning down easy penalties when you have a bust side it tactical naivety of the highest order. Doing this once you can blame the players for but doing it again? The coach should have insisted the two points are taken.
Wane is a very fortunate coach in that when we do have a full squad out it has the quality to beat any side but I am now firmly of the belief his influence on recent successes is very small.
We are in a kind of John Dorahy situation. With a full team out we win despite the coach. The team is good enough to pull it off. A few injuries and when that quality is not on the pitch Wane doesn't have a tactical clue how to mitigate the situation and pull results out. Results that were there for the taking.
Re: If We Lose Tonight
We are missing two centres but its our own fault. We went into the season with just the two (and Gildart who I really rate still learning).Kittwazzer wrote:And Gelling. Every opposition coach has our game plan sussed. Gelling is the maverick they cannot account for!Wigan_forever1985 wrote:We aren't missing smith
Escare on the other hand!
We have done this before and got away with it (Sarge, Gelling and Thornley when he was out for nearly all season) by playing Bateman there but while we have forwards coming out of our ears who are up to SL standard we have no depth at all in the centres.
It's like being without a specialist goal kicker. We got away with it previously. Well not any more. Lack of centres and still no one who can kick goals reliably have caught up with us.
Re: If We Lose Tonight
52 minutes before bentham gives us our first penalty...
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
Re: If We Lose Tonight
Why didn't we start the game like this!?
Footballers spend 90 minutes pretending they're injured. Rugby League players spend 80 minutes pretending they're not.
Re: If We Lose Tonight
Somehow, it's game on!
Footballers spend 90 minutes pretending they're injured. Rugby League players spend 80 minutes pretending they're not.
- Firestarter
- Posts: 6240
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: If We Lose Tonight
Farrell is leading the way.......funny how no one on here has mentioned marshalls try being a country mile forward....... before it it the hull mans head
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
Re: If We Lose Tonight
[quote="Firestarter"]Farrell is leading the way.......funny how no one on here has mentioned marshalls try being a country mile forward.......
sky did though also said hiw it was fine as it touchs a hull player before traveling forward.
sky did though also said hiw it was fine as it touchs a hull player before traveling forward.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
Re: If We Lose Tonight
Why? would he be happy.Wigan Road wrote:Looks like the comeback is over. Dave O will be happy
Re: If We Lose Tonight
thats it i think
again we leave ourselves to much to do. come out play better then they score.
again we leave ourselves to much to do. come out play better then they score.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.