Page 4 of 4
Re: John Kear
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 11:49 pm
by - psycho -
one thing i did notice whilst watching hull was how they play with a momentum attack were the line is set diagonally. alot of people have complined that our attack is to flat and is easily readable. if hull has done this to hull then id be more than happy him do it for wigan. hull also produce a good support playing game.
Re: John Kear
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 11:55 pm
by Wigan boy
we could do alot worse than JK. but as Miss Carny (g'day) says we need some fit players on the field. i think Milward was right he was just dealt a crappy hand. Let's face it they need to appoint someone who is going to get these kids excited and the fans roaring when we stuff the top table teams!!!
Re: John Kear
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:23 am
by GeoffN
Wigan boy posted:
Let's face it they need to appoint someone who is going to get these kids excited and the fans roaring when we stuff the top table teams!!!
Like Betts did this time last year, you mean?
Re: John Kear
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:28 am
by ian.birchall
Fraggle posted:
bainzy posted:
Who would u want?
Kear was dreadful as an assistant coach here with Raper, and didn't seem to want anything to do with the fans. ...
For those with a memory with the attention span of a goldfish Fraggle should we remind them that it was some dispute over Kears expenses that led to his leaving Wigan in the first place. I think that there is as much chance of kear coming back as Millward.