Catalans 40 -v- WIGAN 24

[fitzy]

I thought you could challenge for the ball in the air

[pedro]

wasnt an attack was a collision

[cpwigan]

Do you really think the ref had any effect on the result of that game? Catalans were miles better than us after their shaky start. We were rubbish. The challenge on Richards should have been a penalty but unlikely to result in any more no matter who the ref. In fact, few refs would have been able to see that the Catalans player wasn't contesting the ball.
We were awful, Catalans were good, pretty much explains why we got smashed.[/quote]

Didn't seem to give us many 50-50 calls. Bentham should have seen that Richards incident, or his TJ should have and made him aware via their ear piece system.

Mr Cummings's analysis of Bentham's performance should be interesting. He was in the VR box tonight.[/quote]

Turf what did you think of the officials when they missed a forward pass to Pryce and we scored from the next play or when Joel Tomkins kicked a Cats player?

[fitzy]

tomkins might get a one game ban for that kick

[turf]

I thought you could challenge for the ball in the air

We'll get robjoenz onto this one I think. He should.

[pedro]

tomkins might get a one game ban for that kick

he shouldnt as its a wrestling sweep

[turf]

tomkins might get a one game ban for that kick

If Bentham saw it he will include it in his match report. As he should with the incident we are talking about with the Catalan player and Richards.

[cpwigan]

We also (Coley I think) tried a chicken wing on Ryles. He was none too happy about it. Joel with get away with claiming he was trying to sweep his legs but the reality is he just kicked him.

[fitzy]

They'll see it anyway when they review the game, I'd have thought

[turf]

They'll see it anyway when they review the game, I'd have thought

Expect some action then. Against WIGAN players. The RFL will just slap the Catalan players on the wrist and say don't do it again.

We all know how one eyed they all are on that disciplinary panel.