Frankly, I'd be more concerned if it didn't!cpwigan wrote:My source says words, nothing more. You do realise heated exchanges / bust ups happen a lot at Wigan, at any club for that matter.
Gaz Hock
-
- Posts: 11308
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm
Re: Gaz Hock
-
- Posts: 11308
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm
Re: Gaz Hock
Correct God. This season there have been too many team changes put down to 'last minute injuries in training'!
-
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm
Re: Gaz Hock
Thanks for the tip off WW, I wasnt aware that this was the case. I will be having a word with my safety officer on Monday to confirm this.Wandering Warrior wrote:Panchitta
Having myself worked on and off in the Nuclear industry you are obviously not aware that you should not state you work at Sellafield on a public forum! Security breach, could this be a rumour, no it's a fact!, you are in breach of this rule and subject to discipline if caught!! I kid you not.![]()

-
- Posts: 3108
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 11:09 pm
Re: Gaz Hock
Read the site security documents, it's all in there and a friend has told me the situation is much tighter than when I was there a few years ago. There is also a list of countries you have to advise them of if you visit!Panchitta Marra wrote:Thanks for the tip off WW, I wasnt aware that this was the case. I will be having a word with my safety officer on Monday to confirm this.Wandering Warrior wrote:Panchitta
Having myself worked on and off in the Nuclear industry you are obviously not aware that you should not state you work at Sellafield on a public forum! Security breach, could this be a rumour, no it's a fact!, you are in breach of this rule and subject to discipline if caught!! I kid you not.![]()
![]()
When John Byrom plays on snow, he doesn't leave any footprints - Jimmy Armfield
-
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm
Re: Gaz Hock
Thanks WW, I was aware of the countries that you must advise of before travelling.Wandering Warrior wrote:Read the site security documents, it's all in there and a friend has told me the situation is much tighter than when I was there a few years ago. There is also a list of countries you have to advise them of if you visit!Panchitta Marra wrote:Thanks for the tip off WW, I wasnt aware that this was the case. I will be having a word with my safety officer on Monday to confirm this.Wandering Warrior wrote:Panchitta
Having myself worked on and off in the Nuclear industry you are obviously not aware that you should not state you work at Sellafield on a public forum! Security breach, could this be a rumour, no it's a fact!, you are in breach of this rule and subject to discipline if caught!! I kid you not.![]()
![]()
It seems much tighter than when I was last there.
Cheers.
-
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 11:35 am
Re: Gaz Hock
the golden rule if you are subject to the 'Official Secrets Act', do not discuss or disclose your employment or place of employment and do not mention any of the restrictions placed upon you, if you cannot do that do not sign and do not take the job.
-
- Posts: 3108
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 11:09 pm
Re: Gaz Hock
Correct, glad I'm out of it for the moment!Second Row wrote:the golden rule if you are subject to the 'Official Secrets Act', do not discuss or disclose your employment or place of employment and do not mention any of the restrictions placed upon you, if you cannot do that do not sign and do not take the job.
When John Byrom plays on snow, he doesn't leave any footprints - Jimmy Armfield
-
- Posts: 3108
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 11:09 pm
Re: Gaz Hock
On the bright side we appear to have killed this stupid thread!

When John Byrom plays on snow, he doesn't leave any footprints - Jimmy Armfield
Re: Gaz Hock
Do you guys want to go on a date or maybe pm each other, at the very least maybe start a new thread in off topic?!?
-
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 11:35 am
Re: Gaz Hock
Just explaining in a veiled way why I cannot comment on the Gaz Hock thread, incidentally suggesting dates with other members is a no! no! also,




