WiganWarriorsFans.com

Leave him alone as he must enjoy compiling comprehensive records of things like the number of players cited at each club.

Many others record the numbers of Trains, Buses, Aircraft etc

Its called having a hobby!

No its not,its backing-up your argument with facts.

I'm not one who buys into the idea that wigan get worse treatment however I do feel like Leeds do particularly well when it comes to disciplinary

platt-warrior wrote:No its not,its backing-up your argument with facts.

But backing your argument up with citation facts is a waste of time, the only facts that count are actual suspensions and more importantly suspensions that are not given because certain players/teams are not cited, something that is impossible to back up with statistics.

Whelley Warrior wrote:Leave him alone as he must enjoy compiling comprehensive records of things like the number of players cited at each club.

Many others record the numbers of Trains, Buses, Aircraft etc

Its called having a hobby!

The RFL compile the records. All you need to do is spend a couple of minutes on their website and fact check what you're saying.

TrueBlueWarrior wrote:

platt-warrior wrote:No its not,its backing-up your argument with facts.

But backing your argument up with citation facts is a waste of time, the only facts that count are actual suspensions and more importantly suspensions that are not given because certain players/teams are not cited, something that is impossible to back up with statistics.

Well not if the post you are responding to is taking about MRP citations rather than suspensions. Which to be honest was all I was trying to do - point out that the post about us getting more incidents reviewed after more games than not was factually correct.

The second part of your point is right though. The fact that incidents are reviewed or not is fairly irrelevant if there aren't suspensions.

markill wrote:

TrueBlueWarrior wrote:

platt-warrior wrote:No its not,its backing-up your argument with facts.

But backing your argument up with citation facts is a waste of time, the only facts that count are actual suspensions and more importantly suspensions that are not given because certain players/teams are not cited, something that is impossible to back up with statistics.

Well not if the post you are responding to is taking about MRP citations rather than suspensions. Which to be honest was all I was trying to do - point out that the post about us getting more incidents reviewed after more games than not was factually correct.

The second part of your point is right though. The fact that incidents are reviewed or not is fairly irrelevant if there aren't suspensions.

I wasn't having a go at you markill. I was just saying it in general that the amount of citations teams get is irrelevant really, the major problem is the amount players/teams don't get that is the real problem!!