Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST WINGER

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
butt monkey
Posts: 5416
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:38 pm

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by butt monkey »

elleryhanleyfan​club​ wrote:What about Green Vigo. Great winger not mentioned
You're a strange one!

Register and make one post by resurrecting an eleven year old thread - please explain why?
[img]http://www.webdeveloper.com/animations/ ... monkey.gif[/img]

The biggest Room is the Room for improvement.

The best form of defence is attack!!

Out of the black and into the red, remember you don't get anything for two in a bed!!
The Yonner
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 10:02 pm

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by The Yonner »

At the risk of exercising the troll police, can I ask if resurrecting an old - but interesting - thread is against the site rules?

My reason for adding to it is to point out that Brother Bilko seems to have omitted Lew Bradley from his list, who according to my sums should be in 3rd place on the all time list with 110.5%. Lew took over from Jimmy Leytham and beats him by 8%, so deserves a mention at least.

Actually the debate shows it is not really possible to compare players from different eras.

For what it's worth though I think Offiah was a far better winger than Robinson. Jason was dangerous from short range - he was converted from a scrum half after all - but I can't recall him scoring from inside his own half like Offiah did on numerous occasions. And there was more to Offiah than just speed. He caused havoc by appearing in centre field, and had many try assists to his credit.

P.S. If anybody is worried about my low frequency of posting, it's because I only get time to do this when my wife is away visiting her relatives! So I'll most likely disappear again soon...

Owd Codger
Posts: 5628
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:20 am

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by Owd Codger »

In addition to the obvious choice of Boston, many others like
the following:-

Latham, Miller, Ring, Ellerby, Hilton, Nordgren, Sullivan, Lake, Wright, Jones, Vigo, Robinson, Offiah, Dallas, Richards being just a sample of the many over the years.

morley pie eater
Posts: 3582
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:01 pm

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by morley pie eater »

I suspect far more tries per game in Offiah's era than Billy's. I wonder what Dave Myer's strike rate was with Gene Miles inside him?

Secondly, Billy did have strength as he got older, and probably lost pace, but he still had an elusive swerve of the hips. The only other player I've seen with this was Billy's grandson, Wes Davies. Unfortunately he didn't inherit Billy's other attributes.

Boston before Offiah by a country mile!
Wigan ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Saints ⭐⭐⭐
Lee481
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 11:29 am

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by Lee481 »

Mark Calderwood

:D
Kittwazzer
Posts: 11308
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by Kittwazzer »

morley pie eater wrote: I wonder what Dave Myer's strike rate was with Gene Miles inside him?
You really should choose your words more carefully!????
User avatar
Fujiman
Posts: 3168
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 1:19 pm

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by Fujiman »

Kittwazzer wrote:
morley pie eater wrote: I wonder what Dave Myer's strike rate was with Gene Miles inside him?
You really should choose your words more carefully!????
:lol: :o
cow yeds
Posts: 1149
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:42 am

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by cow yeds »

I've seen Nordgren, Jolly, Ratcliffe, Hilton, Bevan, Sully, Carlton, Lake, Francis, O'Loughlin, Vigo, Wright and umpteen others but Billy is the man for me.
User avatar
Mike
Site Admin
Posts: 7983
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2018 6:54 pm
Contact:

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by Mike »

But how heavy was Boston? After all, this question is "pound for pound". SO you have to divide goodness by weight.

Mark Preston was pretty light - so he'd be up there on those criteria. :D
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
🏆🏆🏆🏆
shaunedwardsfanclub
Posts: 6338
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by shaunedwardsfanclub »

Mike wrote:But how heavy was Boston? After all, this question is "pound for pound". SO you have to divide goodness by weight.

Mark Preston was pretty light - so he'd be up there on those criteria. :D
Not very heavy when he started.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
Post Reply