Page 6 of 7

Re: How good was that?

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:12 pm
by Kiwiseddon
dave the saint wrote:Yet another intelligent response, keep it up meat heads your doing your reputation justice, in fact its becoming very predictable now, what else can I expect though. Time to stop replying to the meat heads now.
Ok Dave, I'll play fair and give you the intelligent response you so desperately need/want.
I was very close to writing on Red Vee just how good I think Saints fans are generally. And I maintain this. After the GF when we beat you, I chatted to several Saints fans who were magnanimous in defeat and shook my hand wishing me well. I did the same and we went about our way.

Today, there were three Saints fans stood in front of me, in the Wigan end and we chatted throughout the game. And they stood and clapped their team off, despite being beaten as they thought that was their responsibility as fans with several hundred Wigan fans screaming in success all around them. They too shook my hand and went home.

What they didn't do was come on a Wigan forum whining like the little bitch you are!!
You are not a Saints fan and you know nothing about the game. Quit trolling and I reckon I speak for most Saints fans when I say just give up on RL.
Today you got beaten, another day you'll win.

But today you're a loser......... a LOSER..........

LOSER



Re: How good was that?

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 12:28 am
by josie andrews
St Helens 10-28 Wigan

ST HELENS (4) 10
Tries: Meli, Soliola Goals: Makinson

WIGAN (12) 28
Tries: Goulding, Carmont, S Tomkins, Hock, Lima Goals: Charnley 4

Wigan ran in five tries as they eased to a comfortable win over St Helens on their first trip to Langtree Park.
After Francis Meli's early score, Wigan turned it round by the break through Darrell Goulding and George Carmont.
Sia Soliola then responded after the restart to pull it back to 12-10.

But Wigan finished strongly, midweek tonsillitis victim Sam Tomkins scoring before Michael Shenton's sinbinning triggered two further late Wigan scores from Gareth Hock and Jeff Lima.

Playing their first game since the announcement of coach Nathan Brown's end-of-season arrival, Saints badly missed suspended duo Paul Wellens and Adam Laffranchi.

And, although on a high after back-to-back triumphs over Leeds and Warrington under caretaker coaching team Mike Rush and Keiron Cunningham, they never recovered from the shock of losing scrum-half Jonny Lomax with a badly-broken finger after just 16 minutes.

But the Warriors had to overcome the absence of five first-choice forwards, skipper Sean O'Loughlin, Epalahame Lauaki, Lee Mossop, Ben Flower and Liam Farrell. And coach Shaun Wane revealed afterwards that full-back Tomkins had been unable to train all week because of tonsillitis and had only played because it was the derby.

It was Tomkins' uncharacteristically clumsy loss of the ball in the tackle that allowed Meli in at the corner to open the scoring on nine minutes.

But, if that was a surprise, it was nothing compared to the shock of seeing a loose pass by James Roby in the move that sparked Wigan's 16th-minute response, Goulding racing away for his sixth try of the season.
“Sam Tomkins has been really sick but there is no way he'd ever have missed this. And this win means everything to Gareth Hock”

Shaun Wane
Wigan coach
Josh Charnley, again deputising as kicker with Pat Richards nursing the effects of his existing thigh injury, kicked the goal. And he was again successful with the boot when Carmont claimed Wigan's second try on 26 minutes.

With Lomax's loss countered by the withdrawal of one of Wigan's key men Richards, that earned the Warriors a 12-4 interval lead, which could have been more but for Soliola's superb last-ditch smother tackle to deny youngster Jack Hughes a try right on the half-time hooter.

That was made to look potentially even more important when Soliola capped a spell of sustained Saints pressure by crashing over 11 minutes into the second half, Makinson adding the extras.

But, eight minutes later, Wigan were able to restore their eight-point cushion when a superb offload by Hock allowed the artful Tomkins to sidestep his way over.

Tomkins rubbed it in with a gleeful victory dance in front of the home fans, who had cause to feel doubly aggrieved as Hock had not been pulled up for a double infringement at the previous play-the-ball.

Wigan then had cause to feel aggrieved themselves when Goulding was denied a second try late on by Shenton's deliberate off-the-ball obstruction.
Shenton was duly sinbinned, forcing Saints to spend the last 10 minutes down to 12 men.

But, although Wigan were still disappointed that the officials did not deem it worthy of a penalty try, they quickly made up for it when the excellent Hock went over for try number four.

Hock tarnished his performance by throwing the ball into the Saints fans to celebrate his fourth try in five games, earning a rebuke from referee Phil Bentham.

And Lima took further advantage of the extra man to claim another under the posts just five minutes later, Charnley adding his fourth kick.

Saints then also lost England forward Jon Wilkin with a shoulder injury just before the end to cap a miserable afternoon as Rush and Cunningham suffered their first defeat.
FROM THE DRESSING ROOM

St Helens interim coach Mike Rush told BBC Radio Merseyside:
"I can't fault any of our players for their effort and their enthusiasm.
Use accessible player and disable flyout menus

"We had to defend large numbers of sets in the first half and it probably hurt us more than we thought at half-time.
"We came out after half-time and I thought, for 10 or 15 minutes, we had them.
"At 12-10, if we're next to score, I'm pretty sure it would have been a different result."
Wigan Warriors coach Shaun Wane told BBC Radio Manchester:
"I'm not grumpy today, I'm the happiest man in the North West.

"I thought the character we showed was outstanding and to come up with a win like that was outstanding.
There were some outstanding individual performances, but as a team we showed toughness and character.
"To come here in the first derby match here and win, it's the best feeling in the world."
GOOD FRIDAY LINE-UPS

St Helens: Makinson; Gardner, Shenton, J Jones, Meli; Hohaia, Lomax; Perry, Roby, Magennis, Flannery, Puletua, Wilkin.
Replacements: Soliola, McCarthy-Scarsbrook, Flanagan, Clough.

Wigan: S Tomkins; Charnley, Goulding, Carmont, Richards; Finch, Leuluai; Prescott, McIlorum, Lima, Hock, Hansen, Tuson.
Replacements: Dudson, Hughes, L Tomkins, Spencer.

Attendance: 17,980.
Referee: Phil Bentham (Warrington).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/17602944

Re: How good was that?

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 12:29 am
by Kiwiseddon
dave the saint wrote:
Kiwiseddon wrote:
dave the saint wrote:Yet another intelligent response, keep it up meat heads your doing your reputation justice, in fact its becoming very predictable now, what else can I expect though. Time to stop replying to the meat heads now.

What they didn't do was come on a Wigan forum whining like the little bitch you are!!

So you know me personally do you, I am in your words little and a bitch, how did you come to that conclusion meat head.

You are not a Saints fan and you know nothing about the game.

Let me tell you something my ignorant half witted bufoon, I have forgot more about RL then you will ever learn in a lifetime.
Today you got beaten, another day you'll win.

But today you're a loser......... a LOSER..........

I see your juvenile immature personality creeping in there my pie eating meat head.
LOSER


Thought it was time to stop responding! Or are you hungry for more.
The reason I called you a little bitch is because if the highlight of your evening is to try and goad us then you Sir, are indeed little. Your attempts prove this, - and a bitch........ well I just said that for fun.

What I can absolutely guarantee is that I'm a very happy chappy tonight and you're so miserable that you feel an overwhelming need for vituperation (look it up) to come on here and have a moan. That's really funny.

I hope your evening descends further as you slowly realise that you've nothing to say except the usual rubbish posted by a bitter loser such as yourself.

Incidentally, you asked for an intelligent repost but intelligence isn't your strong point. You don't even know the difference between 'your' and 'you're'. That was high school, or 'big' school as you knew it, day one for me.

Learn to write and stop being such a loser.

Really buddy, YOU'RE making an arse of yourself on here and you really ought to go away.

Night night.

Re: How good was that?

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:19 am
by exile in Tiger country
dave the saint wrote:I knew meat heads were ignorant but some of the responses on here are nothing short of a joke. Wigan's defence were made to look good because we didn't offer anything in attack today. The loss of Lomax had a bearing on how our attack panned out. Wilkin isn't a recognised half back so our go forward attack with the halfbacks was lack lustre.

If Wigan had met us in the last 2 weeks we would of cut them to ribbons.
instead of If Wigan had met us in the last 2 weeks we would of cut them to ribbons.

You mean If Wigan had met us in the last TWO weeks we would HAVE cut them to ribbons.


The statement, though still utter nonsense, would at least be grammatically correct.

Re: YES YES YES YES YES!!

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 10:27 am
by Kittwazzer
bill.inger wrote:Have yourself a little minute or two reading Redvee.com, there's dozens of the fools on there, all as daft as this turkey.
Bill, I reckon he posts as 'Stoneislander' who was boasting about having been thrown out of the stadium because of his offensive language.

His mum/sister/nan must be so proud! :lol:

Re: YES YES YES YES YES!!

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 11:35 am
by exile in Tiger country
Kittwazzer wrote:
bill.inger wrote:Have yourself a little minute or two reading Redvee.com, there's dozens of the fools on there, all as daft as this turkey.
Bill, I reckon he posts as 'Stoneislander' who was boasting about having been thrown out of the stadium because of his offensive language.

His mum/sister/nan must be so proud! :lol:
I thought there were similarities there too.
Perhaps he should change his name to stone age man.


Re: How good was that?

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 11:39 am
by Kiwiseddon
I think Dave the Saint's put on 5 posts now where he's basically got upset and lost it.


You might even say that 'he's lost it........ 5 times in a row!!!'

Re: How good was that?

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 11:44 am
by exile in Tiger country
Kiwiseddon wrote:I think Dave the Saint's put on 5 posts now where he's basically got upset and lost it.


You might even say that 'he's lost it........ 5 times in a row!!!'
:eusa9:
:eusa2: :eusa2: :eusa2:
:eusa3: :eusa3: :eusa3:

Re: How good was that?

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:04 pm
by josie andrews
mickw wrote:
dave the saint wrote: Defeat I can take but what those players did is despicable and of course you have all got your wigan rose tinted biased spectacles on. I just hope the RFL look at this in fact I will be sending them an email citing these very incidents. Hock should be kicked out once and for all.
wellens did the same thing at our place last season ,short memories you scousers throw him out the game.
They are Neanderthals! they don't have memories or minds for that matter :sly:

Re: How good was that?

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 3:08 pm
by TrueBlueWarrior
We won and they lost end of story, another day it will be another story because that's sport. I was in the Stains end surrounded by stains fans and literally no other wiganers, some of the shouts from the stains fans were ridiculous such as 'hurt him' aimed at Sam and 'you should be in prison' aimed at Hock, but in general they were actually ok especially considering I made it very clear that I was a Wigan fan by jumping up and shouting every time we scored a try. I didn't rub it in though and was very respectful to them but as mentioned so were they, Dave the Saint you are giving decent Stains fans a bad name (something that I know having travelled to the game with decent stains fans) that were very humble in defeat and they would not be very happy with that.