Do you know that he wasn't offered the contract he wanted in March? Also, do you really believe that the things players say in the press are the whole truth about the situation? You only have to read the books they write at the end of their careers to confirm that it never is. You have to learn to take everything they say in the press with a very large pinch of salt. In my mind a quote like "I'd definitely like to extend my stay here" means its an option for me to stay, but I haven't made any decisions yet.DaveO wrote:That doesn't follow at all because TL has been here far longer than Finch and had not expressed a desire to stay on as Finch did. Different players, different circumstances.El Bobbers wrote:Using your theory it doesn't matter if Leului has been here for so long just offer him a highly paid contrat and he will stay so why should we be any less disappointed to see him leave?i'm spartacus wrote:
The fact is that Tommy is leaving after a long stint, George is retiring, big Jeff is leaving, Amos has retired and taking all those into consideration, there should be a significant reduction in the wage bill allowing for better deals to be tabled. Finch is far and away the best stand off in the league for my money, and that being the case we should have tried harder. We have another outstanding talent in Sam; we pushed the boat out for him and quite rightly so and nobody would argue otherwise. Brett Finch brought many things to this club that we will miss when he's gone.
That's why Shaun Wane wanted to keep him, and he made that point long and hard everytime he was asked. However, at the end of the day he states his case, and the powers above him pay the wages and make the deals. Whoever that was needed to dig deeper, and now we just have to deal with the fact that they didn't.
The bottom line is the club has dropped a clanger in getting to a situation whereby both its first choice half backs are leaving at the same time and at the same time we are also losing two other very experienced and high quality players in Lima and Carmont.
BTW its not most likely not Wane's fault (unless it was him who prevented the club offering Finch a contract in March when he said he wanted to stay) as contracts are not usually down to the coach at the end of the day. He just say's who he wants and the club does the rest one way or the other.
He also said this in March:This is what Finch has said
"There are a number of options back home that I find attractive and my life after footy needs to be given consideration. I have thoroughly enjoyed my time in England and to play for a club like Wigan has been a dream."
I'd definitely like to extend my stay here....
Something happened between March and now to get him on a plane home for next season. In my opinion the club messes about too long before sitting down with players especially in this case when it already knew Tommy was leaving. It has been obvious from comments from Finch since then negotiations didn't start for some time after he said that which gave whoever he is going to time to decide to table an offer themselves.
You've just got to accept that sometimes a player leaving isn't anyones fault. The deal we made for Sam was outstanding and very inventive - it had to be in face of the opportunity he was presented with in RU. I can't see any evidence that IL would not have offered Finch a very attractive deal. But at the end of the day, going above a certain level for an individual player is not in the best interests of the club as a whole, and someone has to make that call. Right now I trust IL to know where that line is for each individual. Maybe I'm wrong and the club has treated the negotiations badly - we'll find out in his autobiography i guess.
ALso, there is a lot riding on the replacement we make IMO. I don't think Smith alone is good enough to replace both our half backs. I'd like to see another Finch level replacement at Wigan on a two year deal. If we don't do that, I'll be concerned that financial prudence has too big an influence on IL against on field success.