Page 6 of 9
Re: ENGLAND
Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 7:28 pm
by KOOCH
Whelley Warrior wrote:KOOCH wrote:Whelley Warrior wrote:
Yes, I have been real for over forty years, and I judge a player on how good he is, irrespective of who he plays for.
Too many call him, just because he plays for the Whino's, but would they do so if he had signed for Wigan.
I think not!
What do you want a gold medal?I've been supporting wigan since I was taken to my first game in 1956 think that trumps your 40.As for Sinfield the simple answer is no I would not nor ever would wish to see him in our colours.End of!
No, I don't want a gold medal but like cpwigan, I know a good player when I see one, even when like he says, he is better in his true position of loose forward.
Pathetic and childish to call any player just because he does not play or ever has play for Wigan.
Thank god he's never played for wigan. You can agree with cpw as much as you wish.I often read cpw post's as they often make sense.But this does not mean I always agree with him.As on this occasion regarding behind Sinfield. Nor do I agree with you.
Re: ENGLAND
Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:35 pm
by cpwigan
It would be a boring world if we all agreed on every player, every issue. Vive La Difference!
As Kooch states the more opinions you express the more you will get people agreeing and disagreeing with you because they are intelligent free thinking human beings capable of forming their own opinions.
I really rate Sinfield for Leeds but would not select him for England. It is a complex world we live in.
Re: ENGLAND
Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:42 pm
by josie andrews
cpwigan wrote:It would be a boring world if we all agreed on every player, every issue. Vive La Difference!
As Kooch states the more opinions you express the more you will get people agreeing and disagreeing with you because they are intelligent free think human beings capable of forming their own opinions.
I really rate Sinfield for Leeds but would not select him for England. It is a complex world we live in.
I wouldn't pick him for St Pats
Re: ENGLAND
Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:26 pm
by cow yeds
josie andrews wrote:cpwigan wrote:It would be a boring world if we all agreed on every player, every issue. Vive La Difference!
As Kooch states the more opinions you express the more you will get people agreeing and disagreeing with you because they are intelligent free think human beings capable of forming their own opinions.
I really rate Sinfield for Leeds but would not select him for England. It is a complex world we live in.
I wouldn't pick him for St Pats
now come on St Pats could do with him at this present time
Re: ENGLAND
Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:44 pm
by East Stand Faithful
cpwigan wrote:
Ultimately though we all have opinions, I am a huge Gaz Hock fan but I fully understand that many are not.
I rate good players whomever they play for. For example, I would happily steal Joel Moon from Leeds
You might change your mind about hock now!
I have also been a massive fan over the years but enough is enough![/b]
Re: ENGLAND
Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 11:23 pm
by cpwigan
Very sad news. England seem in chaos and the tournament has not even started; Italy debacle, Hock debacle what next?
Re: ENGLAND
Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2013 12:07 am
by cpwigan
[youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOcmqP1_A0U[/youtube]
Some slightly different highlights, still very brief, still have our golden gal in there, still not enough Italy.
Re: ENGLAND
Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2013 5:02 am
by josie andrews
Cp, the link isn't working
Re: ENGLAND
Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2013 7:42 am
by cpwigan
Early days yet and nothing firmly confirmed but I am hearing Hock spoke up criticising McNamara. He was backed by some other players.
Re: ENGLAND
Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2013 8:53 am
by Owd Codger
People should not speculate unless they do know the truth!