Page 6 of 7
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 5:13 pm
by w.thomas
Yes it was a typo, big hands small keys. It's nice of you Josie to take a break from moaning about everything to point it out. I didn't know this forum
doubled up as a place to whine and also practice English. Good point whoever mentioned about the Welsh hill though, he's much better than Burne and doesn't fold as easy.
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 5:31 pm
by Ipinwigan
pearsy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 3:16 pm
St Helens appeal Mybye 1 game ban we all know what Cullans gonna do
If we're all having a go at other people's spelling, it's Cullen, NOT Cullan
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 5:31 pm
by josie andrews
w.thomas wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 5:13 pm
Yes it was a typo, big hands small keys. It's nice of you Josie to take a break from moaning about everything to point it out. I didn't know this forum
doubled up as a place to whine and also practice English. Good point whoever mentioned about the Welsh hill though, he's much better than Burne and doesn't fold as easy.
I don’t always moan about everything don’t so arrogant! And FYI, that is exactly what this forum is for, for people to comment whether it’s complaining, supporting or whatever as long as it is not insulting other posters! Which from your comment is what you are trying to do!
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 5:32 pm
by josie andrews
Ipinwigan wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 5:31 pm
pearsy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 3:16 pm
St Helens appeal Mybye 1 game ban we all know what Cullans gonna do
If we're all having a go at other people's spelling, it's Cullen, NOT Cullan
I was trying to lighten the mood with my facetious remark re w.thomas’ post!
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 7:01 pm
by southportcdm
Looks like they've lost their appeal on the Mbye ban. Good stuff, nice to see justice done. I would prefer it though that if ever an appeal fails the ban should be extended by a game. That would reward the sensible behaviour exhibited by clubs like Wigan and prevent knee-jerk appeals by other more cynical clubs.
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 7:59 pm
by fozzie58
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 2:02 pm
fozzie58 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 8:04 am
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2024 8:39 pm
Ratchford will do for me, we need someone at 9 who can pass accurately and quickly. I am never in favour of putting a round peg in a square hole. However, in Peet I trust. Same as last week. As for the Saints, they are an ageing team but I think you will find that apart from Makinson and Walmsley they will be able to select their best starting 13.
Thought Hurrell was out for awhile though truth is they’ve got lomax with a broken hand and they are yes experienced but ageing side honestly I can’t see anything but a Wigan win even with injuries this is a very deep squad Wigan have and the kids are just the gravy as they can slot in anywhere
Hurrell could play on Friday as could Matautia, Lomax’s hand is now fully healed.
The way sky where talking Friday he was lucky to keep the hand I really don’t know why I have the volume on doesn’t matter mate Wigan will beat em no matter who is in their team
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 8:36 pm
by widdenoldboy
DaiJones wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 11:22 am
It sounds like Mr Peet is hinting at a debut for Tom Ratchford on Friday. I haven't seen much of him but hear he is quite a talent. It would mean two young, small lads in the middle of the park with him and Farrimond but our Academy products just seem to be able to cope when they're thrown in to these big games.
My slight reservation with Ratchford is that having looked him up on the Warriors website, according to his date of birth, he isn't due to be born until October 10th this year. I know we say if they're old enough they're good enough but a foetus ?
Ratchford is a talent and can kick goals
He lacks experience at Reserves level but I just wonder if Peet is more confident bringing young talent in, he was a little cautious with O'Neil, Hill and Nsemba but has been more proactive lately with Eckersley and Farrimond and both have paid off.
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 10:11 pm
by Charriots Offiah
fozzie58 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 7:59 pm
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 2:02 pm
fozzie58 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 8:04 am
Thought Hurrell was out for awhile though truth is they’ve got lomax with a broken hand and they are yes experienced but ageing side honestly I can’t see anything but a Wigan win even with injuries this is a very deep squad Wigan have and the kids are just the gravy as they can slot in anywhere
Hurrell could play on Friday as could Matautia, Lomax’s hand is now fully healed.
The way sky where talking Friday he was lucky to keep the hand I really don’t know why I have the volume on doesn’t matter mate Wigan will beat em no matter who is in their team
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 10:13 pm
by Charriots Offiah
DaiJones wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 11:22 am
It sounds like Mr Peet is hinting at a debut for Tom Ratchford on Friday. I haven't seen much of him but hear he is quite a talent. It would mean two young, small lads in the middle of the park with him and Farrimond but our Academy products just seem to be able to cope when they're thrown in to these big games.
My slight reservation with Ratchford is that having looked him up on the Warriors website, according to his date of birth, he isn't due to be born until October 10th this year. I know we say if they're old enough they're good enough but a foetus ?
The player profiles are atrocious, it shouldn’t be difficult to give some basic information on players at all levels.
Re: Disciplinary
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 11:43 am
by morley pie eater
Has Mbye's appeal failed? I see the BBC are reporting that he's banned for Fri, whilst saying that Wire's appeal re Harrison was successful.
