Re: Wigan squad for Warrington (R19)
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2024 9:34 pm
So we didn't get a reaction from last week
A site for fans of Wigan Warriors RLFC. News, views, statistics, profiles and more all contributed by supporters of Wigan RL.
https://www.wiganwarriorsfans.com/
Don't agree but at the same time it is.ki d of true.
Like you say, you disagree, but then pretty agree with what I'm sayingCaboosegg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 9:43 pmDon't agree but at the same time it is.ki d of true.
With Smith and French we have 2 halves providing threat. For what ever reason they don't trust Farrimond to do anything but tick and pass. We lose part of our attack.
We are also missing speed and link at FB, nothing about ecksley but replacing pre NRL Tomkins with Hardaker, different skill sets and when you attack was based on ones link play and speed you need to adapt.. we haven't.
I'm more saying we need to change how we play while they are out. We haven't.NE-WW wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 9:46 pmLike you say, you disagree, but then pretty agree with what I'm sayingCaboosegg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 9:43 pmDon't agree but at the same time it is.ki d of true.
With Smith and French we have 2 halves providing threat. For what ever reason they don't trust Farrimond to do anything but tick and pass. We lose part of our attack.
We are also missing speed and link at FB, nothing about ecksley but replacing pre NRL Tomkins with Hardaker, different skill sets and when you attack was based on ones link play and speed you need to adapt.. we haven't.
No French or Field and we look pretty average at best..
Most team sports are made a lot easier when you have the best players, which we have, coaches really earn their money when they get teams to be more than the sum of its parts, which I don't think Peet is doing
And theres still no excuse for this defence
Agree with you 100%, like I say that's where good coaching comes inCaboosegg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 9:54 pmI'm more saying we need to change how we play while they are out. We haven't.NE-WW wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 9:46 pmLike you say, you disagree, but then pretty agree with what I'm sayingCaboosegg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 9:43 pm
Don't agree but at the same time it is.ki d of true.
With Smith and French we have 2 halves providing threat. For what ever reason they don't trust Farrimond to do anything but tick and pass. We lose part of our attack.
We are also missing speed and link at FB, nothing about ecksley but replacing pre NRL Tomkins with Hardaker, different skill sets and when you attack was based on ones link play and speed you need to adapt.. we haven't.
No French or Field and we look pretty average at best..
Most team sports are made a lot easier when you have the best players, which we have, coaches really earn their money when they get teams to be more than the sum of its parts, which I don't think Peet is doing
And theres still no excuse for this defence
Agreed. That’s down to the coaches obviously.Caboosegg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 9:54 pmI'm more saying we need to change how we play while they are out. We haven't.NE-WW wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 9:46 pmLike you say, you disagree, but then pretty agree with what I'm sayingCaboosegg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 9:43 pm
Don't agree but at the same time it is.ki d of true.
With Smith and French we have 2 halves providing threat. For what ever reason they don't trust Farrimond to do anything but tick and pass. We lose part of our attack.
We are also missing speed and link at FB, nothing about ecksley but replacing pre NRL Tomkins with Hardaker, different skill sets and when you attack was based on ones link play and speed you need to adapt.. we haven't.
No French or Field and we look pretty average at best..
Most team sports are made a lot easier when you have the best players, which we have, coaches really earn their money when they get teams to be more than the sum of its parts, which I don't think Peet is doing
And theres still no excuse for this defence