Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST WINGER

[jaws1]

Keri Jones and Frank Carlton

[morley pie eater]

I wonder what Dave Myer's strike rate was with Gene Miles inside him?

You really should choose your words more carefully!????

Oops! Another cock-up!

[butt monkey]

At the risk of exercising the troll police, can I ask if resurrecting an old - but interesting - thread is against the site rules?

It should be??!!

Like I pointed out, why would someone join this site and then trawl through 15 years worth of subjects on this thread alone when they could simply have started a fresh one?

More to the point, why this thread and now? More of a close season filler discussion when their is no rugby to discuss.

[Mike]

At the risk of exercising the troll police, can I ask if resurrecting an old - but interesting - thread is against the site rules?

It should be??!!

Like I pointed out, why would someone join this site and then trawl through 15 years worth of subjects on this thread alone when they could simply have started a fresh one?

More to the point, why this thread and now? More of a close season filler discussion when their is no rugby to discuss.

Why should it be against the rules? People can discuss what they like when they want to.

[butt monkey]

At the risk of exercising the troll police, can I ask if resurrecting an old - but interesting - thread is against the site rules?

It should be??!!

Like I pointed out, why would someone join this site and then trawl through 15 years worth of subjects on this thread alone when they could simply have started a fresh one?

More to the point, why this thread and now? More of a close season filler discussion when their is no rugby to discuss.

Why should it be against the rules? People can discuss what they like when they want to.

Mike, if you want me to trawl the previous 15 years off the site and resurrect threads not relevant whatsoever then I promise you I will and so much so it will pee everybody off enough to leave

There has to be reasons for doing this, and even more so with something relevant that has the need for an ancient thread being brought back into "news"

Surely it would have been more simple for the poster to have started a new thread? Yes? How long would it have taken them to find this particular subject that they were looking for in order to post in? More to the point did they even know it existed?

[Aaron C. Rescue]

Boston, not just, easily.

[Mike]

It should be??!!

Like I pointed out, why would someone join this site and then trawl through 15 years worth of subjects on this thread alone when they could simply have started a fresh one?

More to the point, why this thread and now? More of a close season filler discussion when their is no rugby to discuss.

Why should it be against the rules? People can discuss what they like when they want to.

Mike, if you want me to trawl the previous 15 years off the site and resurrect threads not relevant whatsoever then I promise you I will and so much so it will pee everybody off enough to leave

There has to be reasons for doing this, and even more so with something relevant that has the need for an ancient thread being brought back into "news"

Surely it would have been more simple for the poster to have started a new thread? Yes? How long would it have taken them to find this particular subject that they were looking for in order to post in? More to the point did they even know it existed?

Go for it. If they are still interesting people will comment. If not they won't.

[Kittwazzer]

Go on BM. Find the thread where we all offered to chip in for a one way ticket home for Pat Richards!????

[josie andrews]

Go on BM. Find the thread where we all offered to chip in for a one way ticket home for Pat Richards!????

I felt sorry for Pat that season. He was played out of position for the most part. Plus we were all crap then apart from my beloved Lockers of course ????

[Owd Codger]

Jimmy Hornby 1974-1982 - 201 appearances 87 tries 3 goals 267 points.

Not bad in a period of mediocrity!