We can't because Riddell's legs are shot or I bet with Madge as coach we would. It certainly frees up a bench spot for a back.cpwigan wrote:SL seems to lag behind as always but many NRL clubs now play a single hooker rather than interchange.
Dave
We can't because Riddell's legs are shot or I bet with Madge as coach we would. It certainly frees up a bench spot for a back.cpwigan wrote:SL seems to lag behind as always but many NRL clubs now play a single hooker rather than interchange.
spot on ,leeds brought football mentality to our game ,shame on them. they never stood square, they forward pass all the time (especially when passing to the right)and cheat because they know the ref is soft.It was another game we managed to throw away because we where better but just keep making the same stupid mistakes.DaveO wrote:Dirty yes, class team - no. At the end of the day they had to take Carmont and Richards out with professional fouls on last play to win to match. That's not class. It's not even gamesmanship it's just outright cheating (there s a difference!).jaws1 wrote:We lost through our own mistakes giving penalties ,dropping balls etc .
Ok ALibert was poor we had the chance and blew it ourselves .Just shows the void between Wigan and Leeds they are big game players.They have the class are a dirty side and get away with it
This is a huge issue IMO. Leeds looked like a bunch of Premier League soccer players and it should have cost them the match because Albert should have marched then 10m back for dissent and that would have made that penalty kickable.The refs this season have bottled it big time the dissent that is coming from ther players should not happen its time Scummings got a grip and show whose the boss on the field .
The trouble is this is happening in many games not just tonight and the game is the worse for it. Kids emulate the players and as my son has grown up I despaired watching how young kids would mouth off at the ref in soccer when he played and took pride in seeing the respect the given to the ref when playing rugby. This won't last in rugby if Sinfield and others (such as Briers) are allowed to drag the game into the gutter. Being able to march players back 10m is there for a reason and Albert and other refs need to use it.
Dave
For me that's it in a nutshell.TWO EYED WARRIOR wrote:Here lies the problem then , if we don't learn from the mistake after one or two times and keeping making the same mistake over and over again then it becomes a dumb errors that are costing usIt was another game we managed to throw away because we where better but just keep making the same stupid mistakes.
For me, the squad has been exposed and as many have said during the course of this year we maybe aren't quite good enough to win the play off's this year where as next season we will have more experience added to the team.
The words of a young referee. No not Rob (He's past it now anyway) or TurfPenalty try COULD have come into the equation there imo, because Carmont would have taken the pass from Richards, and probably would have scored.
I always thought penalty tries were awarded for being fouled in the act of scoring so don't see how you can award one for a supporting player being taken out before he gets the ball.Kittwazzer wrote:It was mentioned in the studio albeit in inverted commas and with a question mark!
Can't remember the last time I saw one given, but never from halfway line. Valid point though, but then in everyone else's eyes, we would be the cheats and would NEVER be allowed to live it down!
I think you underestimate the raw experience gained from what was a hard fought game against a seasoned & devious foe.TWO EYED WARRIOR wrote: For me, the squad has been exposed and as many have said during the course of this year we maybe aren't quite good enough to win the play off's this year where as next season we will have more experience added to the team.