Page 7 of 8

Re: St Helens on the prowl?

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:31 pm
by Wandering Warrior
Kaii wrote:This has come from yesterday's match and people complaining he either should of started or came on a lot earlier. If he's signed a 5 yr contract we'd know by now
I really hope you don't make a pratt of yourself over this matter.

Re: St Helens on the prowl?

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 9:38 pm
by Kaii
Wandering Warrior wrote:
Kaii wrote:This has come from yesterday's match and people complaining he either should of started or came on a lot earlier. If he's signed a 5 yr contract we'd know by now
I really hope you don't make a pratt of yourself over this matter.
Over this i have no info what so ever, i'm neither right or wrong. I just can't see why he would go to stains, the move just doesn't make sense.

If he goes he goes, in that case i'd like to see Dan Sarginson get some more game time at 1.

Re: St Helens on the prowl?

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 10:08 pm
by doc
Rocky is not the biggest build. He looks smaller than Sam did at a similar age. Maybe the powers that be have decided that he will never reach the physical size needed at the top level?

Re: St Helens on the prowl?

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 10:20 pm
by Kaii
doc wrote:Rocky is not the biggest build. He looks smaller than Sam did at a similar age. Maybe the powers that be have decided that he will never reach the physical size needed at the top level?
That would be a shame if they did, the lad has so much skill

Re: St Helens on the prowl?

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 10:33 pm
by Wiganer Ted
If they do allow him to go then it will be the worse mistake since we gave Shaun Long away as makeweight in the deal with Widnes.
According to the club he contracted until end of 2016.
So it's either a massive fee or a court case.

Re: St Helens on the prowl?

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:02 pm
by Kaii
Wiganer Ted wrote:If they do allow him to go then it will be the worse mistake since we gave Shaun Long away as makeweight in the deal with Widnes.
According to the club he contracted until end of 2016.
So it's either a massive fee or a court case.
So you say this is just another false rumour, no it can't be not here :lol:

Re: St Helens on the prowl?

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:33 pm
by markill
Was wondering where this has resurfaced from? I had heard that the new deal for Hampshire was as good as signed and was a formality. Someone must be wrong.

Re: St Helens on the prowl?

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 5:30 pm
by thegimble
markill wrote:Was wondering where this has resurfaced from? I had heard that the new deal for Hampshire was as good as signed and was a formality. Someone must be wrong.
Was it not nailed on that George Williams was going to Saints next season as well. Just a few week later he signed a new contract with us.

Re: St Helens on the prowl?

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 5:39 pm
by butt monkey
thegimble wrote:
markill wrote:Was wondering where this has resurfaced from? I had heard that the new deal for Hampshire was as good as signed and was a formality. Someone must be wrong.
Was it not nailed on that George Williams was going to Saints next season as well. Just a few week later he signed a new contract with us.
If it was "nailed on" why did he have to sign a new contract? There must have been interest enough for an improved deal wouldn't you say?

As for Hampshire, my understanding is that promises were made and first team opportunities not given, which in turn has made him think about moving on for regular first team action.

Who's to say how good the information is but one of those youngsters speculated about, has since signed a new contract, so I can only assume there must be "some" sniffing around of the player pool at the very least

Re: St Helens on the prowl?

Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2014 12:34 pm
by southportcdm
With this morning's confirmation that Blake Green is going back to Australia at the end of the season I'd expect (and hope)the club to announce that Rocky has signed an extended contract in the next couple of days.