dontshootthemessenger wrote:you dont get attacked for no reason ? really medlocke
there have been some some bizarre statements posted in the light of the bateman 'incident ' - 'everyones done it 'being another.
So Mossop was stood there minding his own business and a fellow player decided to viciously attack him just for the fun, what a load of bollox
You'd better be careful what you say if I were you, I'm sure the mods will be carefully.monitoring what you are insinuating based on zero evidence?
PS
Your one eyed posts on mossops performances render anything you say regarding the incident as null and void for me as basically your not interested in the truth, just the outcome regarding 1 player you don't like.
PPS
I remember your analysis of Sam Powell some time ago, gone quiet on that lately?
I.e get shut, he's rubbish, no Good.
Then again that was a better analysis than the one you gave on mossop, however equally wrong you are on both.
medlocke wrote:Mossop must surely be at fault, you don't get attacked for no reason and to be attacked in the way he was supposedly attacked then he must have done something very piss poor, it takes two to tango, but it seems only gets reprimanded if the other is in the clique
What a ridiculous statement to make,its obvious you don't like Mossop but without any substantial evidence you have condemned him.You should think before making silly remarks.
Lee is also being investigated. I have no doubt the club will do a thorough review of the incident and both players will be dealt with accordingly. It could be that either or both players will not remain at the Warriors. I doubt if either will be sacked but they could be transfer listed. I do however agree with Meds that both should have been suspended whilst the club looked into the incident.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
dontshootthemessenger wrote:you dont get attacked for no reason ? really medlocke
there have been some some bizarre statements posted in the light of the bateman 'incident ' - 'everyones done it 'being another.
So Mossop was stood there minding his own business and a fellow player decided to viciously attack him just for the fun, what a load of bollox
It does take 2 to tango and usually 1 is the instigator, maybe that was Mossop, however if it was just a fist fight then a weapon was introduced whether that be a bat, bottle, knife or gun, you know Meds that it goes to a whole new level and doesn't just become a case of it takes 2 to tango!!
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
So 2 blokes have a fist fight in the street which arguably both were willing to do then one pulls out a weapon and uses it on the other? Sorry but rightly or wrongly that does not make it equal anymore in anyway shape or form!!
But did that happen in this case, who knows!!
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
dontshootthemessenger wrote:you dont get attacked for no reason ? really medlocke
there have been some some bizarre statements posted in the light of the bateman 'incident ' - 'everyones done it 'being another.
So Mossop was stood there minding his own business and a fellow player decided to viciously attack him just for the fun, what a load of bollox
You'd better be careful what you say if I were you, I'm sure the mods will be carefully.monitoring what you are insinuating based on zero evidence?
PS
Your one eyed posts on mossops performances render anything you say regarding the incident as null and void for me as basically your not interested in the truth, just the outcome regarding 1 player you don't like.
PPS
I remember your analysis of Sam Powell some time ago, gone quiet on that lately?
I.e get shut, he's rubbish, no Good.
Then again that was a better analysis than the one you gave on mossop, however equally wrong you are on both.
If two players have gotten into a fight with each other then they are both in the wrong, one more than the other but both should be reprimanded, it has nothing to do with whether i am a fan of Mossop or not, and if you would like to look through the threads i have made hardly any comments on this matter unlike some who have posted multiple paragraphs.
As for Powell if you can be bothered scouring through the threads you will find that i admitted to being wrong over Powell and actually praised him for taking his chance and putting in consistent performances for 80 minutes a game, i even asked the question if we needed MM back at no.9, the end
dontshootthemessenger wrote:you dont get attacked for no reason ? really medlocke
there have been some some bizarre statements posted in the light of the bateman 'incident ' - 'everyones done it 'being another.
So Mossop was stood there minding his own business and a fellow player decided to viciously attack him just for the fun, what a load of bollox
It does take 2 to tango and usually 1 is the instigator, maybe that was Mossop, however if it was just a fist fight then a weapon was introduced whether that be a bat, bottle, knife or gun, you know Meds that it goes to a whole new level and doesn't just become a case of it takes 2 to tango!!
medlocke wrote:
So Mossop was stood there minding his own business and a fellow player decided to viciously attack him just for the fun, what a load of bollox
It does take 2 to tango and usually 1 is the instigator, maybe that was Mossop, however if it was just a fist fight then a weapon was introduced whether that be a bat, bottle, knife or gun, you know Meds that it goes to a whole new level and doesn't just become a case of it takes 2 to tango!!
Where have i said it 's equal?
I never said you did and was actually agreeing the Mossop played his part just stating that if Bateman used a 'weapon' then that does change the situation considerably again rightly or wrongly!!
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
