Re: Adam keighran
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:19 am
It may have been hinted at on here, but couldn't Peet's unusual admission of interest in Keighran be just a ploy in the King saga with Wire?
A site for fans of Wigan Warriors RLFC. News, views, statistics, profiles and more all contributed by supporters of Wigan RL.
https://www.wiganwarriorsfans.com/
Maybe but im betting if king does go back to wire he wont be 100%morley pie eater wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:19 am It may have been hinted at on here, but couldn't Peet's unusual admission of interest in Keighran be just a ploy in the King saga with Wire?
Like he could leave a foot behind or somethingFirestarter wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 8:36 amMaybe but im betting if king does go back to wire he wont be 100%morley pie eater wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:19 am It may have been hinted at on here, but couldn't Peet's unusual admission of interest in Keighran be just a ploy in the King saga with Wire?
Or his curly mop maybemedlocke wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 5:07 pmLike he could leave a foot behind or somethingFirestarter wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 8:36 amMaybe but im betting if king does go back to wire he wont be 100%morley pie eater wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:19 am It may have been hinted at on here, but couldn't Peet's unusual admission of interest in Keighran be just a ploy in the King saga with Wire?
Firestarter wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 5:15 pmOr his curly mop maybemedlocke wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 5:07 pmLike he could leave a foot behind or somethingFirestarter wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 8:36 am
Maybe but im betting if king does go back to wire he wont be 100%
That doesn't make sense Morley.morley pie eater wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:19 am It may have been hinted at on here, but couldn't Peet's unusual admission of interest in Keighran be just a ploy in the King saga with Wire?
I think what I said may be ambiguous. I didn't mean to imply that we're not interested in signing Keighran and simply using his name in the King situation. I simply meant that it's unusual to go public on interest in a player who we've (apparently) not made an offer ro. It's this tactic of announcing our interest in Keighran that I was linking to the King negotiations. Does that make sense?buttmonkey2 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 5:41 pmThat doesn't make sense Morley.morley pie eater wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:19 am It may have been hinted at on here, but couldn't Peet's unusual admission of interest in Keighran be just a ploy in the King saga with Wire?
Warrington are in the driving seat (to use the analogy). He is contracted to them and will only have £50k of his salary count on their cap from next season when he returns
We could end up not signing Adam Keighran and also lose King all in one go and there's nothing anyone at the club can do to prevent that if Warrington recall him
The only way we could gain an advantage would be to sign a replacement, then Werrington are forced into
a situation whereby they either either find another club to loan him out again to or, he returns and they have to "fix" what's been wrong between them.