archiekeith wrote: ↑Thu Apr 24, 2025 11:56 am
No it's not flash. I'm referring to your "moot" conclusion. The topic under discussion concerns " penalties " The Referee's decision was provoked by the infringement of the rules of the game. Silmple! Anyway I've spouted enough and to be honest with you the only static ( the final score is the only one that interests me.We have a good team and coaches so I'm going to finish my not very moot (I hope ) assertion Cheers!
I'm afraid it is moot, mate, as you've introduced a straw man argument. I never claimed that penalties weren't provoked.
No I didn't. Figuratively speaking "straw man"is an insubstantial arguement my point is substantial relative to ref' penalty awards (see above). All of them are provoked. Re faz. I agreed with you. I think we agree with each other actually cheers Archie
archiekeith wrote: ↑Thu Apr 24, 2025 11:56 am
No it's not flash. I'm referring to your "moot" conclusion. The topic under discussion concerns " penalties " The Referee's decision was provoked by the infringement of the rules of the game. Silmple! Anyway I've spouted enough and to be honest with you the only static ( the final score is the only one that interests me.We have a good team and coaches so I'm going to finish my not very moot (I hope ) assertion Cheers!
I'm afraid it is moot, mate, as you've introduced a straw man argument. I never claimed that penalties weren't provoked.
No I didn't. Figuratively speaking "straw man"is an insubstantial arguement my point is substantial relative to ref' penalty awards (see above). All of them are provoked. Re faz. I agreed with you. I think we agree with each other actually cheers Archie
You need to look up the meaning of a straw man argument mate.
) assertion
Cheers!
cheers Archie