Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST WINGER

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
Ken
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 9:02 pm

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by Ken »

Billy Boston speed and strength had it all
Ken Blinston
User avatar
sheepdip
Posts: 197
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:04 am

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by sheepdip »

Even though he was only at Wigan for a short while, it has got to be John Ferguson. Never watched Boston play so cannot make judgement.
"A STRONG LEEDS IS GOOD FOR THE GAME" (Gratian, H 2006)
No straw damn us
Posts: 2092
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:12 am

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by No straw damn us »

Not even worth the discussion. William John Boston by quite a distance. He had everything, speed, strength, evasive ability etc. Add to that he could play fullback, wing, centre and stand-off, the complete player.
Kittwazzer
Posts: 11308
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by Kittwazzer »

sheepdip wrote:Even though he was only at Wigan for a short while, it has got to be John Ferguson. Never watched Boston play so cannot make judgement.
Same here. I never saw Boston play and Fergie is my all time favourite winger. Think he once scored a long range try with only one boot on!
Wintergreen
Posts: 1808
Joined: Wed May 20, 2015 2:13 pm

Re: POUND FOR POUND, WHO DO YOU THINK WAS WIGANS BEST...

Post by Wintergreen »

Mike wrote:
butt monkey wrote:
Mike wrote:
Why should it be against the rules? People can discuss what they like when they want to.

Mike, if you want me to trawl the previous 15 years off the site and resurrect threads not relevant whatsoever then I promise you I will and so much so it will pee everybody off enough to leave

There has to be reasons for doing this, and even more so with something relevant that has the need for an ancient thread being brought back into "news"

Surely it would have been more simple for the poster to have started a new thread? Yes? How long would it have taken them to find this particular subject that they were looking for in order to post in? More to the point did they even know it existed?
Go for it. If they are still interesting people will comment. If not they won't.
Yep. Pretty simple really!
Post Reply