Cruncher wrote:
I don't care whether they're nice off the pitch or not - though where this notion has come from about Riddel, I don't know. The guy seems to have won people over in Wigan already and he hasn't even arrived yet. But even if he wasn't a nice guy, as far as I'm concerned, he's here to do a job on the pitch and if he does that successfully - i.e. better than the 'nice guys' we've currently got - then it's okay by me.
It is not a matter of being nice as such off the pitch but whether his off field behaviour affects his on-field performances. I am pretty sure both Riddle and Smith have been disciplined in the past by their Aussie club for turning up drunk and/or missing training.
Smith has an excuse with his bi-polar disorder, Riddle doesn't.
What I don't want to see happening id Wigan turning into a club with the sort of reputation Wire have for a drinking culture amongst its players.
Have reservations, by all means, but for Heaven's sake, give people a chance. Whatever happened to welcoming newcomers (especialy when, as you yourself admit, they're "better than most in SL")?
I am quite prepared to give them a chance. Where did I say otherwise?
I am however not going to get carried away and assume there is no risk with either of these signings. Apparently Riddle is a reformed character. Time will tell but there are plenty of RL players out there who are very professional about how they approach the game and have not needed to reform.
If Riddle is a better player than Higham AND matches the professional way Higham approaches the game we will have a very good player at no. 9.
As for Smith's condition - sure, it sounds like a problem. But we're none of us doctors, and even if we are, we haven't had access to Smith's medical records, which I suspect Wigan will have had if they are to make this kid an offer.
All I am saying is it's a risk. It is not hearsay that he has this disorder and you can do your own research about it and draw your own conclusions.
And please, don't compare him to Julian O'Neill. This is the second time I've heard this recently. O'Neill was, at best, an average player. Smith is a very fine player who is also a lot younger. Assuming we're not offering him something silly like 200 grand a year, the potential of this signings outweighs the risks.
The comparison with O'Niel is a valid one because O'Neil came to us with known problems that were apparently behind him. The same can be said of Smith in that we are taking a player on with known problems.
It doesn't matter how good he is if these problems get in the way of his performances for Wigan in the same way O'Neil reverted to type. I thought that was the obvious connection between the two situations.
Dave