Re: Wigan v Wakefield
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:55 am
sorry meant to put exile
well to me that shows good knowledge of the game, showing he knew who he was up against, and he knew he could do it against this player.shawxshark wrote:no panch sam was 7 howarth was 6 with tommy 9
piglet was subbing as he should have been, didnt really like what he did when he scored instead of just putting the ball down he purposely ran at wakefields young full back when he was over line to try run over him when it was easier just to put ball down, i know he plays for our team but its really disrespect to lad who was 1 and altough riddel didnt, he deserved to get put on his arse for a trick like that, i'm sure if it was say sean briscoe at 1 he wouldn't have done that.