A site for fans of Wigan Warriors RLFC. News, views, statistics, profiles and more all contributed by supporters of Wigan RL.
https://www.wiganwarriorsfans.com/
It can drive you to drink sometimesddtftf wrote:I told you all, he is at Wigan on a 5 year deal, see you all at the Grand Final Next Year with G Hock as a 17 stone prop forward. I said Mason of HKR I ment Huddersfield, must keep off the Jack Daniels when I am on here.
not the point though is it, the club should have sacked him on the spot like all the other players who have been caught for drug use, not rewarded with a big juicy contractcpwigan wrote:OH will you ever be happy
Gareth Hock did not cheat. He broke a rule for use of a social drug. He was wrong to do so and got punished for it. A silly boy yes but a cheat NO. Is Ricky Hatton a cheat? I could go on and on.
Wigan follow the rules but trust me Gaz is the most tested / most watched player in RL.
:eusa2:cpwigan wrote:
I hate drugs and everything they do but sadly we seem stuck with them in society.
The point OH was making Hock could come back at the expense of a player like Farrell or Tuscon or any of the other back row forwards who just helped us lift the GF trophy. That hasn't got anything to do with the fact he has served his time.exile in Tiger country wrote:there are players in Superleague now that have come back from performace enhancing drug bans, and it is nevr mentioned now. Ryan Hudson got done for it, served his time, came back, end of!
Tricky question. I'd need to see how Hock's layoff has affected him, but if he's as good as he was before, he'd get in ahead of Liam, for me. It's great to have so many quality forwards available, though - this season has shown that we need all of them, to cover for injuries.DaveO wrote:
Hypothetical question - if you had to chose between Farrell and Hock who would you have in the squad?
Dave
Farrell by a country mileDaveO wrote:The point OH was making Hock could come back at the expense of a player like Farrell or Tuscon or any of the other back row forwards who just helped us lift the GF trophy. That hasn't got anything to do with the fact he has served his time.exile in Tiger country wrote:there are players in Superleague now that have come back from performace enhancing drug bans, and it is nevr mentioned now. Ryan Hudson got done for it, served his time, came back, end of!
Hypothetical question - if you had to chose between Farrell and Hock who would you have in the squad?
Dave
Hock it is, then.medlocke wrote:Farrell by a country mileDaveO wrote:The point OH was making Hock could come back at the expense of a player like Farrell or Tuscon or any of the other back row forwards who just helped us lift the GF trophy. That hasn't got anything to do with the fact he has served his time.exile in Tiger country wrote:there are players in Superleague now that have come back from performace enhancing drug bans, and it is nevr mentioned now. Ryan Hudson got done for it, served his time, came back, end of!
Hypothetical question - if you had to chose between Farrell and Hock who would you have in the squad?
Dave
That is not what I askedTWO EYED WARRIOR wrote:Isn't it the reason Hoffman is only on a short term contract ?
There should be no need to get rid of Tuscon or Farrell as the Aussie guy should make room
. Why is he a cheat?old hooker wrote:I could not give a damn who he is going out with Hock is a cheat,he let down everyone and i hope he goes to Penrith or anywhere , if he does come back then some one like Tucson or Farrell will end up elsewhere due to lack of opportunities in the squad.Get rid now