Page 8 of 8
Re: Sarginson
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:40 am
by nathan_rugby
pedro wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 7:31 am
medlocke wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:50 pm
nathan_rugby wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:36 pm
So you believe two former SL and GB props about Hankinson but not Wane and Lam with the selections they make?
Double standards.
So finally you’ll have to admit lockers is a great player? All coaches pick him and he’s in the dream team and former players say he’s that good......
No, I believe them over you or any other keyboard coach
My point exactly.
Re: Sarginson
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:20 am
by medlocke
Caboosegg wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 3:10 pm
nathan_rugby wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:36 pm
medlocke wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 12:07 pm
And yet two former SL props where saying different last night, Who do I believe, Some gadjee on an internet forum or 2 former Great Britain props who obviously know the game better than some random gadjee, His try saving tackle on Cas center with an African name was superb
So you believe two former SL and GB props about Hankinson but not Wane and Lam with the selections they make?
Double standards.
Not like a brexiteer to listen to experts Meds
Not like a Remoaner to bring up Brexit when nobodies mentioned it
Re: Sarginson
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:21 am
by medlocke
nathan_rugby wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:40 am
pedro wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 7:31 am
medlocke wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:50 pm
So finally you’ll have to admit lockers is a great player? All coaches pick him and he’s in the dream team and former players say he’s that good......
No, I believe them over you or any other keyboard coach
My point exactly.
What's your point clever clogs?
Re: Sarginson
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:41 am
by nathan_rugby
medlocke wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:21 am
nathan_rugby wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:40 am
pedro wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 7:31 am
My point exactly.
What's your point clever clogs?
You referenced two former SL props opinions on Hankinson over "some gadjee on an internet forum."
But time and time again slate Lockers despite him being picked consistently for our last 4 coaches, for england and also in the SL dream team a lot of time.
Double standards.
Re: Sarginson
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:46 am
by pedro
nathan_rugby wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:41 am
medlocke wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:21 am
What's your point clever clogs?
You referenced two former SL props opinions on Hankinson over "some gadjee on an internet forum."
But time and time again slate Lockers despite him being picked consistently for our last 4 coaches, for england and also in the SL dream team a lot of time.
Double standards.
Re: Sarginson
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:09 pm
by medlocke
nathan_rugby wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:41 am
medlocke wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:21 am
What's your point clever clogs?
You referenced two former SL props opinions on Hankinson over "some gadjee on an internet forum."
But time and time again slate Lockers despite him being picked consistently for our last 4 coaches, for england and also in the SL dream team a lot of time.
Double standards.
I have given Lockers his due plenty of times (2009-2017), As for your double standards I couldn't give a flying piss, Cheers
Re: Sarginson
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:46 pm
by morley pie eater
medlocke wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:09 pm
nathan_rugby wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:41 am
medlocke wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:21 am
What's your point clever clogs?
You referenced two former SL props opinions on Hankinson over "some gadjee on an internet forum."
But time and time again slate Lockers despite him being picked consistently for our last 4 coaches, for england and also in the SL dream team a lot of time.
Double standards.
I have given Lockers his due plenty of times (2009-2017), As for your double standards I couldn't give a flying piss, Cheers
