Page 9 of 9
Re: Ainscough & Tomkins
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:38 pm
by platt-warrior
I do believe the 2 players that needed rest were Richards and Hock.The latter seemed to me to be pain when walking off the pitch at half time and when being subbed.
Re: Ainscough & Tomkins
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:41 pm
by GeoffN
DaveO wrote:
I can't think of any reason to drop him other than:
1. Injury.
2. Rest.
3. Tactical.
4. Disciplinary reasons.
5. Personal reasons.
Anyone else think of any other genuine reason he may have been dropped?
Noble's got money on Leon Pryce for leading try scorer?
Re: Ainscough & Tomkins
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:55 pm
by highland convert
Well if the thing is he reads this forum maybe it was payback for the Sack Noble brigade. He might havenoticed the number of SA first,last tries and mom on the preds and thought "I will snooker them." :eusa4:
Re: Ainscough & Tomkins
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:03 pm
by cpwigan
No, this forum is far too intellectual for Noble
Have you read/listened to his latest tripe on the club web site re wanting to give Phelps an opportunity at full back etcand how good he looked. You had how many games last season Brain Noble to do this?
Re: Ainscough & Tomkins
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:14 am
by turf
THE 18th Man wrote:all i will say is that Nobles reason for dropping Ainscough was justified i am not saying whether its disciplinary or any other theroey you would have
I said something fishy is going on!!!!!
