Who said there has been one for the last five years?TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Again I will ask the question, where has this clique been for the last 5 years?
IF there is a clique maybe it has developed this season.
Who said there has been one for the last five years?TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Again I will ask the question, where has this clique been for the last 5 years?
....or maybe in the past 7 days since someone mentioned it on a forum eh?The booze hound wrote:Who said there has been one for the last five years?TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Again I will ask the question, where has this clique been for the last 5 years?
IF there is a clique maybe it has developed this season.
Maybe.TrueBlueWarrior wrote:....or maybe in the past 7 days since someone mentioned it on a forum eh?The booze hound wrote:Who said there has been one for the last five years?TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Again I will ask the question, where has this clique been for the last 5 years?
IF there is a clique maybe it has developed this season.
Lkeptinthedarkfans wrote:markill wrote:Fair enough. I thought they were mates. I thought that whole group that came through at that time were.keptinthedarkfans wrote: That statement is simply not true
Some would think the same as you but There is a big difference in being friends than a clique. As josie's discription of a clique elequantly puts it. By the way to me it is still a click![]()
I'm going for a clique of Lockers, Sam, Joel, Mossop, Faz, Micky Mac.DaveO wrote:Given it could be argued we only have very few key players in the squad of which Bateman is one how many would that be? One? Two?Mike wrote:So keep Bateman and sell at least 50% of the key players in the squad?
I'd go for that top keep Bateman!
A clique is not just a group of friends. If there is a clique of players within the Wigan squad, we'd be better off without them.Bear in mind that a clique is just a group of friends. If something happened to one of your friends would you side with them, or whoever else was involved?
I just find it strange that it has never been mentioned before even though SW has been assistant and head coach for the last 5-6 years bringing through many youngsters he worked with in the juniors during this time, yet no mention of a clique until what just over a week ago because of an off the field incident and how it is being handled!! Just seems coincidental to me!! But maybe I am wrong!!God wrote:Correct, and it was me who mentioned it first off.The booze hound wrote:Who said there has been one for the last five years?TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Again I will ask the question, where has this clique been for the last 5 years?
IF there is a clique maybe it has developed this season.
I am going for no clique at all, just a group of people that think what one of their teammates did was out of order, does that mean they want him sacked? If anyone knows that then you must be well in the know and probably shouldn't be talking about it on a forum!!Mike wrote:I'm going for a clique of Lockers, Sam, Joel, Mossop, Faz, Micky Mac.DaveO wrote:Given it could be argued we only have very few key players in the squad of which Bateman is one how many would that be? One? Two?Mike wrote:So keep Bateman and sell at least 50% of the key players in the squad?
I'd go for that top keep Bateman!
A clique is not just a group of friends. If there is a clique of players within the Wigan squad, we'd be better off without them.Bear in mind that a clique is just a group of friends. If something happened to one of your friends would you side with them, or whoever else was involved?
Lets can em all!
That may be so but he will not be match fit. Look what happened last time we played Cas in t'cup when we brought a number of players back from injury.East Stand Faithful wrote:I think this suspended for 4 matches might be right as that means he would be back for the Cas cup match which is a must win game for me.
It's funny how often in RL a suspension lasts only until an important match!!