WiganWarriorsFans.com

ancientnloyal posted:
So someone tell me again why it was or was not a try.

No...

http://www.skysports.com/skysports/arti ... 63,00.html

Go on then Flash, you & DaveO and myself will have to agree to disagree.

DaveO posted:

robjoenz posted:
The touch judge didn't give the try.

Touch judges can't award tries.

They indicate to the referee whether or not he saw any reason for the try to be disallowed and the nearside referee did just that.

primrose-n-blue posted:

ancientnloyal posted:
So someone tell me again why it was or was not a try.

No...

http://www.skysports.com/skysports/arti ... 63,00.html

Interestingly Cummings, who constantly lies to back his referees, has admitted in the above link that Kirkpartick made a mistake during the Wigan -v- Cas match. The same page in which he defends Presley.

ancientnloyal posted:
So someone tell me again why it was or was not a try.

Touche!

Flash posted:
Interestingly, Rob, he chooses to question a decision given to Wigan rather than the much more contentious (and IMO more blatent) ones that went against them in the same match.

Now it's Cumming's fault for the questions posed to him. Haha, he really can do no right by some people.

Is it not time this was laid to rest?, I understand the frustation from people, But at the end of the day this could go on forever, My opinion is after watching the try / no try, Is it was a try full stop.
But i know someone will come back and say it was not! So nobody is going to win, But lets hope we can start winning tonight against Salford, See you all there. COME ON THE WIGAN WARRIORS!!!!!!!!!!!, Lets kick some ass.