Page 10 of 10

Re: blake green

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:13 pm
by Kittwazzer
cow yeds wrote:I didn't know that they were still playing RU (15 a side) at that first final. Only changed to 13 a side in 1906.
I bet we'd struggle to have followed that game. RL has evolved over 100 years. I imagine 2 years after the split, the game would still be largely the same.

FWIW, the first Wigan Saints derby 16 November 1895 ended 0-0!

Re: blake green

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:42 pm
by ancientnloyal
Going back to the second post - I am in awe that there are 8 and a half minutes of Mr Green's highlights

Re: blake green

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 11:09 am
by ian.birchall
Kittwazzer wrote:This 'more of an effort' is becoming tedious. We should have made more of an effort to beat Leeds in the semis. Could not more of an effort have been made to keep Tommy or Lima?

Its not like any of them are switching to another SL club who made 'more of an effort' than we did.

These people are their own men. They make their own decisions!
It would have been very easy to keep Lima, we could have said NO TO HIS REQUEST TO BREAK HIS THREE YEAR CONTRACT. I've never subscribed to the idea that players have all the powers and contracts are only one sided.We could have threatened Lima that we would continue to play him every week and he would run the risk of doing an injury to himself if he did not train up to match fitness and run hard in every game, after all we continually hear that injuries are caused when players 'ease off' in the latter stages of a game

Re: blake green

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:48 am
by Mike
thread locked due to legal complaints.